The fact that it’s the consumer’s responsibility to sort their waste and to try and minimise its impact on the environment in the first place is completely wrong to me.
Most people in urban areas rely on stores for basic survival, and the vast majority of products we buy there come with unnecessary waste. It doesn’t make any sense to then tell these people “by the way, you’d better clean up that mess when you’re done because it’s bad for the environment”. If governments were truly concerned or willing to act, this waste wouldn’t make it into our homes in the first place.
If a company wants to sell a product, they should be held accountable for the waste that comes along with it. They should have to prove that they can reuse the waste and be incentivised to reduce it. If they can’t, they can’t operate.
Ecocide laws need to become commonplace, and the consumer should not be responsible for their waste if they haven’t got legitimate alternative options. I understand this community is more willing to do their part in this regard, but I don’t think it’ll ever be feasible to expect this from the wider population. We need to stem the flow, not just handle the mess.
I think the simple way to accomplish what you’re saying is to require all manufacturers and distributors to put significant deposits on their packaging. It would force them to take back their packaging for reuse or proper disposal. I would want such a measure to be paired with standardization of all packaging. There should only be one type of container for each set of similar products.
So they would have to pay for the packaging, and upon reusing/recycling it they get the money back? It’s a great idea - but who would they be paying this deposit to? The government?
In practice, it varies between jurisdictions who is ultimately responsible for the deposit. Regardless, it’s a policy that works really well for bottles and cans. It should be applied to other types of containers and packaging.