• OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    No it isn’t.

    And this is really important. If you go on Google tracked websites without tor, Google will still know it’s you when you use tor, even if you’ve cleared all your cookies.

    Tor means people don’t know your IP address. It doesn’t protect against other channels of privacy attack.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s been a long while since I looked, but I remember it being a thing in tails to specifically not resize your browser window or only have it full screen to match a ton of other fingerprints.

        Plus since it was a live distro that reset on every reboot it would only have the same fonts and other data as other people using tails. Honestly, I hate that all that info is even available to browsers and web sites at all.

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t quite understand – does this feature let you resize the window again to the size you want, and you are still sharing the same fingerprint with everyone else? Or do you still have to keep the browser window the default size to minimize your unique fingerprint?

            • Forbo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              It rounds the browser window to the nearest 100x100 window size. Using the default will likely be the biggest dataset to hide yourself in, but maximizing the window will still have some amount of obfuscation.

        • Canuck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Good point, that difference does matter. I guess other browsers like Brave use the Tor Network, and it would be misleading to suggest Brave has good anti-fingerprinting.

          What kind of fingerprint avoidance are you suggesting then that the Tor browser cannot do that makes a difference?

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            If you enable JavaScript, you open Pandora’s box to fingerprinting (e.g. tracking mouse movements, certain hardware details, etc). If you don’t, half (or more) of the internet is unusable.