Summary

Despite the 22nd Amendment barring a third term (“No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice”), Trump continues to suggest he could run again, raising the idea at a Black History Month event and with Republican governors.

Legal experts say the Constitution is clear that he cannot run, though some supporters, including Rep. Andy Ogles and Steve Bannon, are pushing for a constitutional amendment or a 2028 campaign.

Meanwhile, Trump has expanded executive authority in his second term, drawing criticism for undermining congressional checks.

  • Pondis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    200
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    To be fair he wasn’t supposed to run for a second term as a convicted felon, but he managed that.

    I’d like to say I’d be surprised if he could win another election as his popularity plummets, but the US voters have proven themselves to be stupid and/or lazy.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      126
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Being a convicted felon does not disqualify you from running for president, or from being elected to the office.

      Fomenting insurrection does, but that got waved away “because reasons”.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          51
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Nah, Colorado was handling it appropriately, then SCOTUS stepped in and told a state that they’re not allowed to administer elections in their state.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Because Biden appointed a bitch instead of someone who would actually do their goddamn job.

      • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        22 hours ago

        As convicted felon you can’t run for position of burger flipper at McDonalds, but you can become a president…

          • AreaKode@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            And if you, and potentially multiple family members, don’t pass a background check… you still qualify!

          • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I mean, it should be fine to stop someone from running a country if they are a felon, but that requires sane, rational adults.

            • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              20 hours ago

              No. It should never be fine. People make mistakes. People fix those mistakes. But more importantly, you never want it possible for a political arrest to disbar a person from office.

              • zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 hours ago

                Problem is he wasn’t just arrested. Convicted by a jury, incited an insurrection on live TV, retained classified documents and hid them from the FBI, and attempted a coup with the fake electors scheme…it’s a massive leap beyond just being “arrested”.

                He’s literally guilty of blatant treason. That should obviously be disqualifying. Brazil, which might be considered a “third world country” by many Americans, handled their similar situation infinitely better.

              • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                18 hours ago

                Sure. Pardons are a thing. And again I said sane, rational adults. I’m not saying that there ARE sane rational adults, I’m saying in an idyllic world

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised. He promised an end of elections and voting. This is what his voters wanted.

      • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Take the good with the bad, if we have to re-do the voting system I say we move towards a more popular-voting system and get rid of the electoral collage, it’s time to shake up the gerrymandering of districts in favor of GOP Senators/Congress.

        Time for an overhaul!

        • Dojan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I think he’s aiming more to become an emperor. That said, I like the positive outlook! If he fucking ruins everything, there’s always room for the Americans to build something better in the mess he leaves.

          • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I’ve been thinking about this a lot recently. The abject destruction of all aspects of law and government being carried out by Trump/Musk right now is, objectively, a bad thing that’s going to hurt a lot of people very badly. But once their system inevitably completely collapses, I think a lot of Americans are going to be open to new ideas of governance.

            Previously, we could all see problems in our systems but the path to actually getting them solved involved generations of focused political maneuvering to actually stand a chance of putting them in place. Take federal adoption of ranked choice voting as an example. Many people would say they were in favor of that but we all knew it had a snowball’s chance in hell of ever actually happening because of how our system of governance was set up. I fully expected we’d just coast along with FPTP voting until we’re all dead from climate catastrophe.

            But now, we’re actually looking at a potential full scale, whole hog destruction of the foundations of American government. Whoever inherits it afterward - and someone will, this reign won’t last forever, it’s incapable of sustaining itself even if we all just left them alone - has the potential for nearly a ground-up rewrite of some fundamental assumptions of American government. We’re talking about changing the baseline voting systems, changing eligibility for office for many roles, even fundamentally changing the way our representation is appointed (such as by population size instead of by land, for instance - one rep for every, say, 500,000 citizens, not two reps per state regardless of population) and so on.

            Rising from our own ashes may just end up being one of the best things to ever happen to America, in a historical context. Inevitably, no matter how this farce ends up resolving, we will have an opportunity for this afterward. Trump, in his bumbling fury, has swept away decades worth of red tape and inertia that we otherwise would have had to struggle through to make this happen, and in addition has galvanized a lot of latent anger with the system within the citizens. We will have a real chance to turn that into something constructive after all this finishes in whatever way it does.

            That’s my light at the end of the tunnel for all this, and in a weird way, I guess I have Trump to thank for this. His signature style of completely ignoring norms and regulations means that he can blast through a ton of bullshit while being completely immune to the feedback, and we can just build it all up again from scratch later in a term or two instead of taking six decades to effect gradual change.

            Previously I would have called this accelerationism and maybe condemned it, but we’re in the shit now, so may as well get it over with I guess. He’s already throwing all his toys out of the crib no matter what I say about it so I’m no longer ashamed about cheering for it. America has had a deep sickness in its government for a very long time and maybe now we can excise it. We’re losing a lot of healthy tissue alongside it, and that’s bad, but it’s not likely to kill us altogether. We’ll grow back stronger.

            • NotLemming@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I’ve thought the same but this is all dependant on someone sane being able to take power back at some point soon. Where will all the crazies be when this better society is being created?

              The climate catastrophe is also a ticking time bomb with very little time left to avert total disaster. The other problem is that Putin caused this situation for a reason and honestly I’m thinking he destabilised the world because there’s a plan involved. Call me crazy but Russia, China and whoever could be aiming to invade. What else are they playing at? They’re all megalomaniacs and they’re going to control all these countries where the US was giving aid (and I’m sure spying).

              And then there’s an asteroid, currently a 3% chance of hitting. Have you seen ‘don’t look up’?

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      24 hours ago

      That, and we have that stupid Electoral College. Oh, and lots and lots of fuckery from the Republican apparatchiks when it comes to running our elections.

      • shani66@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Being an insurrectionist is a guilty until proven innocent thing as far as the constitution goes iirc. At least in regards to holding office.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      I hate to ‘akshualllyyy’, but actually there’s nothing in US law or the constitution that precludes a convicted felon from running for or holding office.

      There was a lot of legal talk leading up to the last election about that, along with plenty of surprise that was the case. It turns out it was another of those gentlemen’s agreements that was never codified because up until very recently, most people just assumed voters were smart enough not to elect someone like that, so codifying it wasn’t worth anyone’s time.

      If we ever wrest control back from these ghouls, there are a shit-ton of things that need codifying.

      e: a few words

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        If we ever wrest control back from these ghouls, there are a shit-ton of things that need codifying.

        While this is absolutely true, it is not a good idea to make felony conviction a disqualification from holding office. Look at who’s controlling DoJ right now, and there are plenty of states that will follow that lead. Making it so that a felony conviction disqualifies a person from holding office is just a roadmap for corruption to follow in order to maintain control.