• M0oP0o
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 小时前

    It was not included before it was invented, it was also not needed as the level of voter disenfranchisement was not yet an issue. It is now the standard metric (since you guys have so many people that are barred from voting).

      • M0oP0o
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 小时前

        It only does that if you sort by VAP, and that metric just does not hold up when an estimated 4.4 million adults can not vote. But these are all issues that neither party cared to address for the last 40 years so I don’t think anyone can claim the high horse.

        If you look at the the 1960 (JFK vs Nixon) then maybe if they had VEP then it could have been another barn burner to compare.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 小时前

          Your first source shows over twenty million.

          It also shows 94% of the VAP are VEP in 1980 vs 92% in 2024 so I don’t think using VAP as a metric to include twenty-four elections instead of twelve with VEP is unreasonable.

          • M0oP0o
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 小时前

            That is a trend that is not good. It shows more people losing the ability to vote. I would say something needs to be done, but like I said, its been 40 years of both parties not doing anything about it. And now? Not even sure if you will have another election this free.