liv@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 2 days agoOpenEvidence Sounds Promising, but is it Reliable?medium.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up118arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up118arrow-down1external-linkOpenEvidence Sounds Promising, but is it Reliable?medium.comliv@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square5fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareliv@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoWhen we look at passing scores, is there any way to quantitatively grade them for magnitude? Not all bad advice is created equal.
minus-squarejarfil@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 hours agoThe grading is a mess. It goes about qualitative, quantitative… and statistical corrections “to make it fair”. Anyway, there is ~30% margin on the scores for passing, so chances are that 9% is better than the worst doctor who still “passed”.
When we look at passing scores, is there any way to quantitatively grade them for magnitude?
Not all bad advice is created equal.
The grading is a mess. It goes about qualitative, quantitative… and statistical corrections “to make it fair”.
Anyway, there is ~30% margin on the scores for passing, so chances are that 9% is better than the worst doctor who still “passed”.