• small44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ok my mistake but that is just one example. They may exists some two similar community with different rules. I constantly read people opinions on the fediverse selling point was about it being censorship resistant because you can switch to another instance

      • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I constantly read people opinions on the fediverse selling point was about it being censorship resistant because you can switch to another instance

        It is, but that’s an emergency measure, not a day to day basis

      • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        similar community with different rules.

        In those cases, the communities should not consolidate, and would not “follow each other” under Proposal 3.

        • small44@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          So the solution may only reduce the duplications but not fix it completely. A lot of communities are already dead with no active admins

          • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            no active admins

            Admins or mods?

            If a community has no active mods, you can usually request it from the admins. If an instance has no active admins, it will probably shut down soon.