Source Link Privacy.

Privacy test result

https://themarkup.org/blacklight?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tarlogic.com%2Fnews%2Fbackdoor-esp32-chip-infect-ot-devices%2F&device=mobile&location=us-ca&force=false

Tarlogic Security has detected a backdoor in the ESP32, a microcontroller that enables WiFi and Bluetooth connection and is present in millions of mass-market IoT devices. Exploitation of this backdoor would allow hostile actors to conduct impersonation attacks and permanently infect sensitive devices such as mobile phones, computers, smart locks or medical equipment by bypassing code audit controls.

Update: The ESP32 “backdoor” that wasn’t.

  • notanapple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    We really should be pushing for fully open source stack (firmware, os) in all iot devices. They are not very complicated so this should be entirely possible. Probably will need a EU law though.

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Open source stack will not prevent this. It’s not even a backdoor, it’s functionality that these researches think should be hidden from programmers for whatever reason.

      Open source devices would have this functionality readily available for programmers. Look at rtl-sdr, using the words of these researches, it has a “backdoor” where a TV dongle may be used to listen to garage key fobs gasp everyone panic now!

      • notanapple@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        thats a very fair point, I had not seen anyone else make this one But the problem is that in this case, this functionality was entirely undocumented. I dont think it was intended for programmers.

        Now if the firmware was open source, people would have gotten to know about this much sooner even if not documented. Also such functionality should ideally be gated somehow through some auth mechanism.

        Also just like how the linux kernel allows decades old devices to be at the very least patched for security risks, open firmware would allow users of this chip to patch it themselves for bugs, security issues.

        • oldfart@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yeah, of course, it would be better in many ways if the firmware wasn’t closed.

    • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I 100% believe firmware should be open source no question about it. There’s so many devices out there especially phones and iot devices that just become e-waste because you can’t do anything with it once it’s not supported if it was open source and documented in some way then it could be used. I have like five cheap phones that I got because they were so cheap but once they lost support they’ve become completely useless even though they still work.

      • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        But then big companies wouldn’t be able to keep milking the consumer via planned obsolescence. Won’t somebody think of the shareholders?

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        This is about silicon. Undocumented instructions have just been found in it but they are not executable unless the ESP32’s firmware uses them. Firmware cannot be edited to use them unless you have an existing vulnerability such as physical access or insecure OTA in existing firmware (as far as researchers know).

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Backdoored devices are useful for people who can impede that.

      And the way EU is approaching privacy, surveillance and all such, - oh-hoh-ho, I don’t think there will be a EU law.