There are still hurdles to overcome, but growing the seaweed industry in a state known for lobster could be a win for local fishermen, dairy and cattle operations, and the planet.

    • FatCrab@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Ummm…that article says there was still a drastic methane cut, it was just ~20% after accounting for the longer life of the cattle due to unpredicted slower mass gain with the supplement. They had hoped for no changes to development of the cattle and around 80% or higher emissions cut. Article also makes it clear there were a lot of confounders in how they measured methane in the trial so this is realistically a great starting point and a strong show of the value proposition. Moreover, seaweed is good for water ecosystems so cultivating it at scale would be another value add. I don’t eat farmed meat, but I don’t expect that to ever be standard across the human species and this is certainly a strong improvement. You don’t seem to understand what greenwashing is.

      • Nyssa@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah, I think its useful to continue trialing out the technology and see if it can hold up to snuff. But at the same time banking on this idea as our only approach to decarbonizing protein (which is what the beef industry would prefer) is short sighted, imo

        • Beastimus@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          51 minutes ago

          Yeah, decarbonizing meat without reducing consumption isn’t gonna be a long term solution, but if it works, it can be a part of it. Hoo ha diverse tactics!