Da Cap’n@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Mobile Wallpaper@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 天前Intergalactic bedroomlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up164arrow-down17
arrow-up157arrow-down1imageIntergalactic bedroomlemmy.dbzer0.comDa Cap’n@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Mobile Wallpaper@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 天前message-square9fedilink
minus-squareGlytch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·2 天前Looks like there isn’t one; it’s ai generated.
minus-squareZero@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 天前Dang. How could you tell? I’ve found it relatively easy to distinguish when it’s “realistic” art but I don’t know any techniques for identifying generated “drawings”.
minus-squareanomnom@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 天前The details on the walls are all blobby up close, and lettering on the bed sheets is junk too.
minus-squareHalosheep@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 天前Check the detail on some pieces. The text on the blanket, the “lights” on the panel behind the bed. The light fuzziness around circles and straight lines wherever a lot of detail tends to go is usually a good indicator. Most image models will put little details at weird angles or without any clear pattern that a human would’ve probably overthought and made straight.
minus-squareHideakikarate@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 天前For me, it’s the NASA logo. Looks like shit.
minus-squarewebghost0101@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-21 天前Someone still generated it, some ai generated works result from a very complex creative process with a lot of artist effort going into it. Not this one though, this is minimal effort.
Looks like there isn’t one; it’s ai generated.
Dang. How could you tell? I’ve found it relatively easy to distinguish when it’s “realistic” art but I don’t know any techniques for identifying generated “drawings”.
The details on the walls are all blobby up close, and lettering on the bed sheets is junk too.
Check the detail on some pieces. The text on the blanket, the “lights” on the panel behind the bed.
The light fuzziness around circles and straight lines wherever a lot of detail tends to go is usually a good indicator.
Most image models will put little details at weird angles or without any clear pattern that a human would’ve probably overthought and made straight.
For me, it’s the NASA logo. Looks like shit.
Someone still generated it, some ai generated works result from a very complex creative process with a lot of artist effort going into it.
Not this one though, this is minimal effort.