• limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Nobody can prove it did not happen either.

      Anyone can say anything about any of the systems, and it would take a panel of experts to explain why it may or may not be a valid criticism.

      That is the problem with computer voting in the USA ; it’s inscrutable , the exact opposite of how a democracy should function.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        40 minutes ago

        Because no one can prove a negative. Therefore the accusation or claim is null.

        Also, it’s not computer voting. It’s a touch screen that then prints out your votes. That’s what you put in the ballot box.

        Have you not voted recently?

        • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          30 minutes ago

          I’ve probably been voting longer than you been alive. I’m so glad you could resolve my confusion with such bland, marvelous words, which shows a dedicated understanding of this very complex topic.

          I’m sure you looked at the 176,933 precincts in the USA that has over 100 voting systems, with numerous often contradictory practices, and mediums ranging from paper ballots to many other types including the very fancy touch screens. In fact I know you did. I will rest easy. Again, thank you for helping me