• justsomeguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 days ago

    Many people who have been in abusive work situations know that there’s a point when you should leave but the constant drain from the abuse keeps you in a state of exhaustion that prevents any action. It’s often only once this makes you so physically sick that you have to take the time off and realize this can’t go on any longer.

    I believe this is the zone where Amazon wants to keep their employees. Fully exhausted, given up on any possible improvement.

    If you find yourself in a situation like this, run like fuck.

  • DearOldGrandma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The title is vague, so here’s the title of the actual study the article is based on:

    Weaponizing the Workplace: How Algorithmic Management Shaped Amazon’s Antiunion Campaign in Bessemer, Alabama

    Also, the problem isn’t the algorithms used for the work. The problem is the metrics they expect employees to consistently hit. The technology isn’t the problem, they just expect too much from their employees.

    Source: Worked in a lot of different Amazon buildings

  • qwestjest78@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Here is my question, why would they want to do that? Like I get that they want to maximize productivity, but if you keep pushing them, then eventually people quit. Don’t they still need workers?

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The strategy so far has to just hire new ones. The job is so on the rails anyone can do it. The machine tells you where to go, which items to pick up etc

      You obviously don’t want people to quit, but they want to push them as hard as possible without making them quit

    • Zetta
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      As Evotech said already, they churn through their tier 1 workers at a breakneck pace anyway. Pushing them harder won’t make the issues worse, it’s already bad. Plus they are continually striving to automate everything possible, so eventually many low level jobs at the warehouse will be automated

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      For warehouse positions, at least a decade ago, “hiring events” consisted of showing up with a valid driver’s license. I think they did a background check. No interview. Boom, you’ve got a job.

      They effectively have an infinite labor supply and have everything structured to be incredibly resistant to what little room there is for error.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Serious question: why do people work at amazon? Are they unaware of what’s happening? Is the money just that good?

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      The alternative under capitalism is death or at the very least being an outcast from society.

    • Mniot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Changing jobs carries a lot of risks:

      • Many Americans live paycheck-to-paycheck and cannot afford to quit their bad job before looking for another
      • American healthcare system means that if you are between jobs and anyone in your family gets seriously sick/injured then you will be in medical debt for the rest of your life
      • For many people, there are few jobs available. Maybe the other jobs pay too poorly for them to live on
      • As discussed, employees aren’t given slack-time, so they can’t search for a new job while at work
      • Because they’re exhausted, they can’t search for a new job while not at work
      • Amazon isn’t the worst place to work. Your next job might be worse! (Small businesses in the USA are exempt from many rules and effectively-exempt from many more.)