cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agoWhy indeedlemmy.mlimagemessage-square206fedilinkarrow-up11.53Karrow-down126cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.51Karrow-down1imageWhy indeedlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agomessage-square206fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareaeshna_cyanea@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoDon’t we have compression built into http already?
minus-squarebleistift2@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoI guess it’s easier and safer to make a string replace for each function name beforehand than hoping the compression algorithm will figure that out. Also, as SpaceCowboy points out, comments are completely useless for the final web page. There’s no need to even compress them.
Don’t we have compression built into http already?
I guess it’s easier and safer to make a string replace for each function name beforehand than hoping the compression algorithm will figure that out.
Also, as SpaceCowboy points out, comments are completely useless for the final web page. There’s no need to even compress them.