Papua New Guinea’s government has shut down social media platform Facebook, in what it describes as a “test” to mitigate hate speech, misinformation, pornography and “other detrimental content”.

The test, conducted under the country’s anti-terrorism laws, began on Monday morning and has extended into Tuesday.

Facebook users in the country have been unable to log-in to the platform and it is unclear how long the ban will go on for.

The government’s move was not flagged ahead of the “test” on Monday — a move opposition MPs and media leaders have described as “tyranny” and an “abuse of human rights”.

Facebook is by far the most popular social media platform in the country, with an estimated 1.3 million users, or about half of the country’s estimated 2.6 million internet users.

The platform is a critical tool for public discourse in the country, with many highly active forums used to discuss PNG politics and social issues.

Yet, the government has been highly critical of Facebook with the platform often blamed for helping spread misinformation, particularly in light of a recent spate of tribal killings in the country.

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    Is it really a problem for freedom of speech, if it’s only a platform getting banned and not specific content?

    If you are allowed to talk about anything still everywhere else on the web, I can’t see the freedom of speech card being valid in this case about FB.

    FB is already controlling what you see, making freedom of speech better without them.

    • max_dryzen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Look at what’s really happening though: the state is implicitly saying you can have free expression provided your reach is miniscule/ineffectual. The moment you get traction is the moment it will move to block use of your preferred platforms, or simply hard-/algorithmically ban you - it’s functionally identical to suppression of speech/association

      They rely on the public’s credulity when they insist freedoms are intact because ‘only one website’ is verboten. It’s a dirty exploit. In reality, all platform denial should be protested

      • Zoot@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Facebook exclusively promoted rage bait and is used as a propaganda machine, if anything they’re circumventing a free and open space by not showing you everything in the first place.

        If Facebook simply gave you a wall of every single thing pushed and didn’t hide/promote things you would have a leg to stand on.