• Bonehead@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s a little more complicated than that. Carrey was negotiating for Dumb and Dumber when Ace Ventura hit the box office. By the time the negotiations ended, there wasn’t much money left for other actors. But that one movie was really all that he was known for at the time. So it was still a huge risk for a potential flash in the pan.

    Daniels wanted to expand his career into comedy, but the producers didn’t want him since he wasn’t known for comedy. He had done a lot of movies by that point though and was well known, just not for comedy. So they threw him a lowball number to get rid of him. He wasn’t suppose to take it.

    It was all just really wild timing on Carrey’s part and priorities not focused on money on Daniels’ part.

      • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Dumb and Dumber is my favorite comedy of all time, but I’ve avoided that sequel like the plague. It looks like it has the budget of an SNL sketch

      • MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        68
        ·
        10 months ago

        According to chatgpt because I had a hard time googling it - $50M he got for the sequel . Meanwhile chatgpt recon6s Jim Carey got $15M

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          75
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Chatgpt is in no way shape or form a reliable source of information. The Information provided may be out of date, out of context, or even wildly wrong and you have no way to verify this unless you do the research yourself.

          All our current parodies of actual AI are able to do is be very convincing that what they say is true. They don’t know if it’s true, nor are they able to figure that out. They don’t care either. They are just chatbots with bells and whistles.

          Do not use them as sources of information, if anything have them give you an answer that you can then use as a starting point to verify their truthfulness.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          10 months ago

          According to chatgpt

          According to my hairdresser, chatgpt is not a reliable source of information.

        • XEAL@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          10 months ago

          As much as I am a ChatGPT fan, you cannot trust it when it comes down to factual data unless you’re using a custom model with a specific knowledgebase.

        • Ithi@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think a lot of basic obscure facts like this are likely to be inaccurate from ChatGPT if its difficult to find it from a basic search engine.

          Who knows what random source it is viewing as the “truth” and spitting back out to people.

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          This is so hard to read, I’m assuming you’re 6 years-old. Or an AI, the end result is the same…

    • Dark_Lords_Servant@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Oh, interesting. Thank you for the info! I was going with a general knowledge that the more well known actors get paid more because of their popularity. Seema this one was a different case.