Luis von Ahn says criticism over strategy change shows ‘anxiety’ about technology replacing jobs
Archived version: https://archive.is/20250608171624/https://www.ft.com/content/6fbafbb6-bafe-484c-9af9-f0ffb589b447
CEOs are overall just not smart and we need to stop that belief
Is there really a single person of this belief, after the whole HBO name-change stupidity? That is still among the worst business and branding decisions I have ever seen.
I would argue that it is one of the most deeply held American beliefs even if it’s not talked about openly. Successful people are almost always viewed as intelligent by default. Despite all evidence to the contrary.
People STILL call Elon a genius ffs
“Well if they are so dumb why do they have so much money???”
Lemme rephrase that for ya mate:
“I did not anticipate people getting angry that i turned the program into a complete steaming pile of useless shit”
It’s not the children who are wrong.
„AI is creating uncertainty for all of us, and we can respond to this with fear or curiosity.“
How about we respond to this with reason?
Cancelled my sub when I found that out. Switched to busuu, comparing the two, busuu and Duolingo seem to have different teachings and I noticed that my ability to understand things (comments) in duo is slowly becoming paywalled on the pro(paid) version… Wtf??! Quality of lessons is also seemingly going down.
Then I heard they are handing user data to ICE (maybe this is a rumor) but it just pushed me away even quicker.I don’t have proof of this so I take this back but am leaving the text so as to give context to the comments below.
They don’t appear to be sharing any data with ICE. The Mozilla Foundation issued a report saying defence contractors were assembling dossiers from publicly available data, including duolingo data.
https://cyberinsider.com/mozilla-calls-for-action-to-stop-surveillance-firms-data-scraping/
Ahhh. I see. So it was some what alarmist. I shall update my comment.
Try Language Transfer. It’s a very different approach from rote memorization.
CEOs are rich enough to live in their own delusional bubble. They are very out of touch with the average person, or their own workforce. This is nothing new.
Of course he didn’t expect the blowback. All of the CEOs are in their own little worlds trying to figure out how to make money off of AI. They’re all taking their personal money and investing heavily in AI corporations, so they’re all very pro AI and couldn’t understand why your average person who is pretty sure it’s going to make their life worse through jobs or other means would be anti-AI.
Still not installing it, Luis.
I Uninstalled. And use Memrise now, it is very fun with video of people to understand the word better
I also made the switch to Memrise. Its great! Actually a platform made for learning and not just a game disguised as learning.
They also have an option for a lifetime purchase instead of a running subsciption, which I am a huge fan of.
”I’m out of touch with reality” - another dipshit rich guy.
That’s a plain and simple admission that you are incompetent at your job. You should resign not post puff pieces at FT…
I feel like the only job AI would be better suited at would be CEO.
I mean, they take in current hype, change a few words and then regurgitate it with slightly different words.
Nah let him keep it longer. I think the company sales can go lower
Luis von Ahn says criticism over strategy change shows ‘anxiety’ about technology replacing jobs
Motherfucker, you’re the one that fired slews of employees to be replaced by text-prediction algorithms. It’s not “anxiety”, you’re fucking doing it.
Yeah, he learned nothing. He’s just upset that everyone didn’t agree with him.
He’s going to keep pushing the same nonsense as soon as the attention blows over, and he’ll be just as surprised when it goes bad.
Anti-human little creep, I uninstalled and cancelled my subscription as soon as I heard the news
Way to reinforce the stereotype, out-of-touch rich dude. Most people who actually work for a living see no benefit from AI, and resent it being shoved into every single product, whether it makes sense or not. Oh well, at least you can burn boatloads of VC money while also destroying the environment and abusing intellectual property to train it!
LLM are actually moderatly useful in my line of work but I still think they are super unethical and terrible, ungodly things.
It’s hardly surprising that these people are out of touch when they’re constantly surrounded in a bubble of yes-men, cultish AI sycophants, VC investors and other “dark enlightenment” enthusiasts.
It’s a pathology, really. A kind of shared delusion in service of global capital.
christ i hate the term “dark enlightenment” more and more it’s being used to be an “inevitable” and romanticised spin to reactionary bullshit, stupidity and panic
AI could easily replace ceos
Seriously - LLMs are much more adequate to do a CEO’s job than an engineer’s. Maybe the crazied scramble to push AI “features” into products is to distract customers, workers and shareholders from this fact?