• bonjour
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Haha, no worries. But you did not like getting your toxic ass called out there, did you.

        Anyway, it’s kinda nice to see that regular users seem to support my case, downvotes all come from you or cm0002 and their claquers who have nothing to do with the niche topic, just politics.

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          But you did not like getting your toxic ass called out there, did you.

          Given that votes on Lemmy are pseudo-anonymous, publicly calling someone out for how they vote comes with a certain amount of aggressive or combative connotation. However, I recognize that “pseudo-anonymous” is not “actually anonymous”, and I respect your freedom to do so.

          • bonjour
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            You thought long and hard for that reply, and it turned out very reasonable.

            Seeing that you’re so such a reasonable person i wonder what made you downvote what they had posted there?

        • jet@hackertalks.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          the best thing for old internet beefs is to just let it go and walk away. bygones. its all done and dusted, no need to stir the pot

          • bonjour
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            It is not old internet beef, it is ongoing. I am not looking for it, I want to just be left alone by them, that’s it.

            • jet@hackertalks.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              If you just want to be left alone you probably shouldn’t @ one of the fighting parties

              • bonjour
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I am not going to just swallow their bullying but will keep speaking my mind on it, I want to have some agency for the content I post. They spoil my fediverse experience. It’s not like they’d stop if I’d just shut up.

                • jet@hackertalks.comOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  ok… what is the TLDR?

                  They reupload your original photos to different communities?

          • jet@hackertalks.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            i wanted to know what the beef was about, but then i saw the other comment about wanting to be left alone so i decided not to bring it up.

            As far as I can tell from 30s of looking at message histories its about photo reuploading, but idk

              • jet@hackertalks.comOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I don’t have a dog in the crow game, seems like the best thing is for the content posters of the new community to block the old community and not top-post the old posters content. Nonconsensual consolidation of content, even if they are not the copyright holder, is going to get a strong emotional reaction from people.

                There has to be enough Crazy Crow content for everyone

  • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    Oh wow. Just looked at the votes of a harmless happy post that had lots of upvotes and a few downvotes. With this tool, I was able to figure out who was that one downvoter. Well, then I dug a bit deeper, and found out that this user seems to be a serial downvoter. Every day, there’s a proper barrage of downvotes directed at pretty much anything and everything.

    I have very mixed feelings about this discovery. Kinda nice to know all this, but it certainly didn’t make me happier.

    • Skavau@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Every small-to-medium sized community trying to build will have a handful of users like this. I managed to discover the serial downvoters on my old lemm.ee comm and when I banned them (about 4 of them?) it had a huge impact. They didn’t all downvote /everything/ but they downvoted a lot of things, and no contribution. And if they got in early, they could sink new threads.

      Made a huge difference.

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s a nice tool for admins and mods, but then again they already pretty much had access to this information. I’ve always believed votes are obscured for good reason, and knowing how people vote on your posts and comments is only going to bring about negative emotions.

      • Elevator7009@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Wait, we did? I’m a mod and had no idea I could see peoples’ votes. How do I do that? I say, as I probably will never use it until I start seeing my communities consistently getting downvotes on inoffensive posts that have no misinformation and are clearly on topic.

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Mods and admins need to know, but everyone else will just find sadness in this kind of data. I asked, but clearly wasn’t ready to hear the answer. Well, now I know where some of those seemingly random downvotes come from.

    • jet@hackertalks.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      But if your a community moderator, you can use this tool to identify the bad actors and uninvite them from the party.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Some instances have defederated from Lemvotes—including lemmy.ml—which blocks its functionality. Past polls have shown that most Lemmy users do not want votes to be visible, so we will continue do what we can to keep them that way.

    If you suspect vote manipulation, I suggest reporting the post(s)/comment(s) accordingly, and let the mods & admins handle them; we can see the votes already, without external tools like Lemvotes.

  • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Post up votes: 96k

    Post down votes: 171

    Comment up votes: 91k

    Comment down votes: 162

    I’m a pretty easy guy to please.

  • inlandempire@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Damn i should vote more

    Total post upvotes: 722

    Total post downvotes: 4

    Total comment upvotes: 1699

    Total comment downvotes: 34