• Chais@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    So people are forced to install the vendor’s bloatware. Lovely. They just keep giving people new reasons to ditch Windows entirely.

      • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I did.

        Microsoft has noted that printer manufacturers no longer need to bundle their drivers with Windows updates. Instead, they can build their Print Support Apps by leveraging the UWP development framework and distribute them through the Microsoft Store to offer customized experiences.

        I read this as drivers are not required in WHCP, put it in the MS store so we can force more account signups, and you can make them download your program filled with customer experiences like ads and useless bloatware.

        2026 all new drivers will not be allowed on WHCP because custom experience.

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          To be fair, printer drivers are, have been, and always will be shit. So chances are very high that while malice is possible, incompetence is significantly more likely in this case (pushing towards a more stable option)

          • ares35@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            hp’s ‘smart’ app is already the poster child for incompetence. give me the basic drivers-only installer.

          • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            A lot of business class printers require no drivers, as it’s built into the printer itself. My little bw xerox printer I have at home is like this. It’s OS agnostic too. So any device on my lan can just connect to it and print.

            Home consumer grade stuff is an absolute nightmare, and has been for a while now. I mostly deal with biz class stuff, but the rare time I deal with consumer grade makes me wanna pull my beard off.

            • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yes this! Spending a little extra to get a good laser printer that’s made for the small office or home office makes all the difference.

              I’ve got Linux computers, a Windows 10, two Macs, Android tablets, an iPad, three Android phones, two iPhones, and five Pis. None of them have problems printing to my Brother laser printer out of box without a driver via IPP.

              The shitty consumer, we’re just selling you ink in a roundabout way, kinds of printers are the ones that require bloatware. Stay away from those and you’re golden.

              • HidingCat@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Brother lasers are great, I always tell people to get those. Inkjets are only for photos, and even then, we’re talking at least 5-6 colour printers that start at US$500, not the cheap consumer shit at US$100 or less.

          • leftzero@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Wasn’t it precisely this question that got Richard Stallman started on the whole free (as in speech) software thing…?

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Bad printer drivers already require account signups and push ads and bloatware. Whether or not the drivers are obtained from bundled OS updates (gross) or a storefront is entirely irrelevant.

          Just get printers that don’t require special drivers. That would be most printers that aren’t bottom of the barrel e-waste.

  • jaiden@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why do they need drivers ? They all do the same thing, just print dots, they don’t even have character ROMs anymore.

    FFS, a printer is literally the simplest thing you can connect to a PC, its simpler than a mouse. And they are older than video screens !

  • paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Does Microsoft sell first-party printers? Even then this would seem shortsighted. Why would they remove a helpful platform feature that their industry position gives them an advantage in?

    • gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      They are going to basically force printer manufacturers to use the Microsoft store. The goal I assume is to drive traffic to the Microsoft store so that people get more used to using it.

    • ijeff@lemdro.idOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      I might be wrong, but it sounds like those third-party drivers have largely been rendered obsolete?