• Dr. Coomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What do you mean, thorium is far more common than uranium and require less processing to be used. Plus, it isn’t always active like uranium, meaning it can be controlled a little better. It’s worth looking into.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s exactly what I mean. There are benefits that sound great. However there’s not a practical reactor based on that, yet.

      In some ways it seems like fusion. Every few years you see a flurry of headlines of how great it would be, and we’re only ten years away, but it hasn’t happened