• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    None of that has anything to do with breaking apart a country to make it weaker, which is entirely the point of the balkanization argument.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      No one wants to conquer Russia. No one has wanted to since Napoleon. Even Hitler’s dumb ass only invaded out of paranoia.

      Personally I want Russia balkanized because the only thing holding that mess of a state together is authoritarianism. I’d much rather see a whole lot more liberal democracies in place of a single Russian country.

      Same with China.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        There more than one way to conquer a land, it’s not just a matter of occupying it physically. According to you, they resort to authoritarianism because of culture. How would splitting up the country change that instead of simply making a bunch of smaller authoritarian governments? In fact, the situation would be worse because a bunch of smaller authoritarian governments bordering each other would be more likely to go to war. Of course, that’s an intended consequence of balkanization: the weakening of those countries.