You can debate the need to arrest, but creating a ruse that ends up with the man being shot several times?

  • Bondrewd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did you even slightly think that through, and how that would work?

    So if government is not a person, then who are “they”?

    • danielfgom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The super wealthy of this world: people like the Royals, Rothschild’s, Oppenheimers, Rockefeller’s, Du Pont etc

      Once you get power you never let it go. These families got power centuries ago and still have it.

      • Bondrewd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Based on my knowledge so far, societies that have official and serious limits on personal wealth usually rely on a stricter hierarchy which they usually intend to be meritocratic.

        Modern world analogies are communist regimes and company hierarchies. Technically the CEO or Stalin is equally subservient to these entities, but what does that look like in actuality? They have total control and can terminate you at ease and without considerable objections.

        If the rich get no generational wealth, you will not just be a pisspoor citizen, but a peasant without rights.