• Sonori@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, but there is a big difference between leveling out at 10 billion, 100 billion, 1 trillion, or 10 trillion, and since we can probably sustain any of the four numbers listed above with current tech, social factors will decide where more so than an inability to meet demand.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If population jumped into the hundreds of billions we would die off for a bunch of different reasons. Current tech doesn’t really exist to sustain a population that large.

      • Sonori@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean obviously if a hundred billion just appeared tomorrow then we would have trouble scaling production, but i don’t think we really lack any of the hard inputs. Switching from open field to greenhouse food production alone increase food production ten times over while reducing water usage, just require a lot more farmers. We are not about to run out of land for housing anytime soon, and have plenty of spicy rocks for fission power.