cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400327

In case anyone is wondering, it’s rqd2.

The definition of paraphilia is “a condition characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities.”, which can inclde pedophilia.

It has recieved 4 censures from fediseer due to the content contained on that instance

Not a good look for Lemmy to be promoting any instance like that.

You can see for yourself here

Update: A pull request was sent to remove the sus instance. It should no longer show up soon

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I apologize, I thought I did, I read the rules, and I read on the frontpage, and it seemed pretty harmless.

    And there were no posts here that showed anything actually wrong, but mostly what seemed like knee jerk reactions to the accusation.

    Had I dug one step deeper, I would have found it. But my diligence wasn’t diligent enough, and I wrongfully concluded it was an anti LGBT issue.

    Turns out I was mistaken, and yes I was a bit slow to figure that out.

    • ゴン太
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Respect 👍

      More people need to learn how to gracefully accept mistake like you did, even myself.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you. 😀 This mistake was a really bad one. I do NOT support pedophilia, but it may have looked like it. So better to admit fault.

        But I also believe truth is more important than ego.