Sarah Huckabee Sanders rose to national prominence in part during her time at the lectern as White House press secretary, but the purchase of a $19,000 lectern for the Arkansas governor is undergoing scrutiny and prompting claims that records about it have been altered.

A legislative panel next week will take up a lawmaker’s request for an audit to review the purchase of the lectern, which was bought in June for $19,029.25 with a state credit card. The Arkansas Republican Party reimbursed the state last month for the wood-paneled and blue lectern, which the state received in August.

“From my experience, where we’re at with this particular thing is we need to allow legislative audit go in,” Republican Sen. Jimmy Hickey, who requested the audit, said. “Everyone knows them, they do their work, they’re very thorough and then they produce a detailed report that comes to the Legislature through an open committee.”

  • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    $10 would work ok but $500 not unreasonable

    It’s just 50x the price to go from ‘okay’ to ‘good’, fuck it why not 200x to get the ‘great’ model? It’s only taxpayers money!

    Shit, if I ran this country, everyone would be using $10 ikea end tables stacked 2x tall for their ‘I’m important and need a fancy stand’. The microphone is your voice being louder. Want a chair, that’s not in the budget sorry. You so much as take an Uber to a press conference and that’s also coming out of your own pocketbook. Ain’t showed up on Thursday? You ain’t getting paid for Thursday. Govt shutdown? Oh I’m sorry, you thought you were getting paid for not doing your job?

    But no, no, gotta pamper the idiots who think they matter. Damn country is fucked 8 ways from Sunday.

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A $100 mic (the SM57 the president uses) is enough better than a $10 mic that speakers and audiences should care. The $500 mic is slightly better but most people can’t tell outside of AB tests in a controlled environment. As you go over $100 in price microphones get more special purpose and often are worse than cheaper ones outside of their special purpose - each human voice is different, so $500 is about the most you can spend on a general purpose microphone and be objectively better than something cheaper. While you can spend $2000 or even $4000 on a microphone, they tend to be very fragile - as in breath on them wrong and you break them - so they are only used in studios where you can ensure nobody breaths wrong around them.

      Remember, I’m trying to come up with the reasonable most you could pay for this. You really should be spending less. There is no reasonable justification for the 200x microphone. There is a reasonable justification for the 50x cost - if only just barely justifiable.