Never talk morals with libs because these are the things they spend their time questioning. Whether or not it’s okay to use AI to detect CP. Real thinker there

https://lemm.ee/post/12171882

  • LeylaLove [she/her, love/loves]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hash lists exist yeah. But American law actually requires website hosts to keep the CP for evidence instead of deleting it. It’s why DivideBy0’s tool isn’t supposed to be used for American Lemmy instances. Like if you upload a flagged image to Google drive, Google is supposed to flag it, save it, and call the cops.

    • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      i get that its supposed to be for evidence but its really fucked up to have to put small time server owners through that shit, terrible law. got to be some other way to handle that

      • LeylaLove [she/her, love/loves]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        I agree. The DivideBy0 tool should be standard on here. Instantly deleting it when its uploaded and saving post ip is the best solution. More just explaining that anybody in the position to make a tool like that wouldn’t have to go out of their way to get source material because legally speaking, they should already have some. There are site hosts that ignore this law and just delete and ban instantly (as they should), but I think it’s important to explain why these tech companies just happen to have large repositories of CP to train AI on.