Masimatutu@lemm.ee to Not the Onion@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoThe Economist has killed satirefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1455arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net
arrow-up1450arrow-down1imageThe Economist has killed satirefiles.catbox.moeMasimatutu@lemm.ee to Not the Onion@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square54fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net
https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2023/10/30/what-a-third-world-war-would-mean-for-investors archived link
minus-squarehakase@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down7·1 year agoWebsite called “The Economist” talks about the economy. Lemmy.ml users: shocked-Pikachu-face
minus-squareOrcocracy [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·1 year agoi was shocked when I found out that The New York Times wasn’t a clock and watch fan forum for New Yorkers.
minus-squaremriormro@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoI’m not shocked by the article focusing on trade. It’s just the tone it has when discussing global nuclear war is a little bit too much on the blasé side for me.
minus-squareLadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoIdk it’s kinda like asking “What does global nuclear Armageddon mean for your investment portfolio?”
Website called “The Economist” talks about the economy.
Lemmy.ml users: shocked-Pikachu-face
i was shocked when I found out that The New York Times wasn’t a clock and watch fan forum for New Yorkers.
I’m not shocked by the article focusing on trade. It’s just the tone it has when discussing global nuclear war is a little bit too much on the blasé side for me.
Idk it’s kinda like asking “What does global nuclear Armageddon mean for your investment portfolio?”