• RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol you’re the one contributing to making it worse. Google already loses money on operating YouTube and freeloaders only exacerbate that loss. They’re going to make ads longer, unskippable, and take away your perception of a choice. They’re going to kill every other option you have. Pay or stop watching.

        • sour@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          it was worse before i started blocking ads

          look what you made me do

          pay or stop watching

          no

          • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Pay or stop watching isn’t the choice I’m putting in front of you.

            It’s the one YouTube is winding up to put in front of you. Good luck.

            • sour@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              you made it look like that

              youtube is winding up to put in front of you

              will they send police if i keep blocking ads

        • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Normally I’d agree with you, but this is Google, the 4th largest companies in the world, not some scrappy startup which might go away next quarter if they can’t hit their revenue target. If Google actually shutdown YouTube, I’d cheer because that’s when the real competition begun in the video space.

          • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right, so only scrappy startups deserve to run a profitable business and Google should be forced to choke down the abhorrent cost of YouTube out of… what exactly? If they were making money hand over fist on it, sure, fuck em. But they’re not. YouTube isn’t profitable and the reason there aren’t competitors is for that exact reason. They are literally free video data storage with no limit. No site can compete with that. Everything else would make you pay for a membership or have a small hard limit or even have some kind of gate yet you take it as the standard.

            If YouTube fails there will be no alternative to take their place. Amazon might try, but their greed might stop them. They’re already a household name, what would the point be?

            • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The thing is, I’m ok if Google do this right from the start. Instead, they use their massive capitals to run YouTube for free and squashed all their competitors. Vimeo was the most promising competitor in this space, but they can’t compete with Google’s infinite subsidy to YouTube and had to pivot. Now that there is no competitor around anymore, Google jacked up prices, reduced monetization rates for their content creators, locked up formerly free features behind subscription plans, and now declaring a war with adblockers.

              If YouTube fails there will be no alternative to take their place.

              So yeah, I’m not supporting Google in this space because this whole situation where there is no competitors to YouTube anymore is Google’s own doing.

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Browsers that block data, Adblockers that block ad revenue, no interest in a subscription.

        You give nothing, take everything, then act entitled to do so. Yeah, stealing is an apt word for it. At least own what you are.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I walk through a park

          “You are stealing since you contribute nothing back!”

          lol hell yeah, this is a fucking stick-up

          • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            A park is funded by the city. The city is funded by non-negotiable taxes.

            You’re new to this, aren’t you?

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Private park, where you can come in if you watch the bilboards. And I’m not looking at your bilboards. I’m sorry but I just won’t look at them like lol

              Geez use a little imagination, public city parks aren’t the only parks

              • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Your analogy falls apart like wet toilet paper. Private highways require tolls, a small contribution to the maintenance of the road. Renting a car, house, etc. The concept of letting people use something expensive for a small nominal fee is the very foundation of our society and on the internet, that fee can be pushed to advertisers if you don’t want to cough it up. Block the advertisers, you’re stealing the service, which comes with a fine or jail time. Since we can’t do that, want to know the alternative?

                Blocking adblockers. Hulu and Twitch already do it. How long before they remake their player to do the same? You don’t get it. The mega corporation always gets paid and they will damn sure sink the platform if they can’t.

                • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You can’t compare toll roads, this would be like a road paid for by billboards and you agree to look at the billboards if you want to use it. And no, I’m not looking at the billboards.

                  If you they didn’t want me to “steal” (lol) their bandwidth, they should have gates or whatever in it. Until then, I’m cruising through

                  • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Toll roads are a perfect example actually. You need it, alternatives are inconvenient, you have the ability to pay and drive through or you can choose not to. They just don’t have the advertiser workaround. It’s pay or fuck off.

                    Your entitled attitude is what’s going to get us to a point where premium will be required to watch videos. Adblockers only work because they let them. You’ll have a rude awakening soon.