• M0oP0o
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok, I think this is just trolling at this point. No way someone can make this argument in good faith AND throw out that weak of an insult.

    • Arrkk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its like its totally impossible for a word to mean 2 slightly different things is different contexts.

      • M0oP0o
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah if only we had some sort of non profit organization to run some sort of massive online wiki to keep this all straight for us.

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          If only that organization had a citation method at the bottom of every page where anybody with half a brain could find actual sources.

          • M0oP0o
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, clearly your clear misunderstanding of a topic must be because people are not providing primary sources…

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it was a banger insult, just enough not to seem unreasonable. If I wanted to alienate the opposition then discussion would very quickly become meaningless, like your comment for example: completely devoid of any relevant context, only an attack on my person.