• bird@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m super excited about this space and what it will mean for computing paradigms going forward. I know there is a lot of saltiness at the price, but it’s not a shocker. I’m a tech early adopter and will likely want to jump on this when it comes out next year, more so out of curiosity than anything else.

    The digital avatar they previewed in the keynote gave me slightly uncanny vibes but I imagine it will improve with time/before release.

    • Blissingg@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is the price not a shocker? Like we all expect an Apple Tax but this literally 2x the cost of the highest priced headsets released so far.

      • YuzuDrink@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not a shocker for me because I’ve been hearing rumors for months that it’ll be $3000+; but other than that, yeah, it’s… a very bold statement on their part.

      • chinpokomon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        For Mixed Reality devices, it is the same magnitude as Hololens 2 or Magic Leap 2, the biggest difference being Passthrough AR vs. Optical AR. A more comparable device is the Quest Pro, but the AR experience is probably much higher resolution and with binocular color cameras and depth sensors it hopefully doesn’t have distortion.

        Yes, it is a lot for a VR device, but for a standalone MR device it is comparable with higher fidelity, so it isn’t significantly more expensive than other devices in the same category… arguably it is the best value for the category if the cameras and screens have a wide FOV with high resolution and can accurately reproduce the HDR of an environment.