• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The NRA post the 1977 Revolt at Cincinnati would never support the Mulford Act.

    There was a presidential race three years after the “Revolt”. The NRA chose to endorse a candidate in that race. Given what we discussed so far, (and knowing I involuntarily rolled my eyes so hard that I sprained them after reading your quoted claim above), can you tell me which presidential candidate the NRA endorsed in 1980?

    That’s right, sports fans, the Mulford Act supposedly had gun owners revolting against NRA leaders in '77, but by '80, they were endorsing the asshole who had signed it.

    In 2012, there was exactly one presidential candidate in the race who had previously signed a gun ban. That candidate was the one who somehow “earned” NRA endorsement.

    The NRA is a Republican front that occasionally masquerades as a gun rights organization, and its members are suffering from Battered Woman Syndrome, repeatedly going back to their abuser.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Before 1977, the NRA supported Reagan’s Mulford Act.

        After 1977, the NRA supported Reagan’s presidency.

        You do understand that these aren’t two people who both happened to be named Reagan, right? You are aware that both of these Reagans are actually the same person?

        “Well, I know he fucked us over in 1967, but he can change! And if we don’t support him now, he might not be there when we need him!”

        It was despicable for the NRA to support him in 1980. It was despicable for the NRA to support Romney in 2012. The Revolt in '77 was the membership calling the police against an abusive husband, then refusing to press charges.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That it happened? No, not a matter of opinion.

        But post-revolt NRA still backed the Governor who signed the Mullford Act when he ran for President just 3 years after the Revolt at Cincinnati. So clearly the supposed goals of post-revolt NRA weren’t so important as to not support any and every Republican to follow.