noxfriend@beehaw.org to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agonewest tech stack just droppedbeehaw.orgimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1105arrow-down10
arrow-up1105arrow-down1imagenewest tech stack just droppedbeehaw.orgnoxfriend@beehaw.org to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squareButtons@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-21 year agoStill easier than understanding JavaScript’s equality operator
minus-squareSmorty@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoYou think you? I felt like Java Script was easy
minus-squareHexarei@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoSure, it’s easy: https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
minus-squareMars@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoIt’s super funny, but if you don’t try to use things as what they are not, the type coercion can’t hurt you. But if you make a tradition of trying to add empty objects and numbers… The great sin of JavaScript is gracefully (silently) failing when coders do silly things.
minus-squareSmorty@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoWow this was good. Thanks for sharing this gem.
Still easier than understanding JavaScript’s equality operator
You think you? I felt like Java Script was easy
Sure, it’s easy: https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
It’s super funny, but if you don’t try to use things as what they are not, the type coercion can’t hurt you.
But if you make a tradition of trying to add empty objects and numbers…
The great sin of JavaScript is gracefully (silently) failing when coders do silly things.
Wow this was good. Thanks for sharing this gem.