EDIT: we just crossed 30K 🥳


We are now at 28.5K users (see https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/list). The top 10 instances also got a decent boost in user count. With the exception of beehaw.org which defederated, the Fediverse is thriving 🔥

  • Thepinyaroma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 year ago

    Funny thing for me, is that Beehaw was the first bit of the Fediverse I ever came across. Tried to sign up, twice, didn’t work. So that’s how I ended up on .world, the first group I found that didn’t want an essay to sign up.

    • eric5949@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was on beehaw until they defederated, just seemed like the wrong answer to me and one that will just end up being damaging to Lemmy, especially the way they went about it.

        • eric5949@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well if I didn’t understand that I’d not be on this instance now. I just didn’t like how they did it with 0 warning when those instances were increasingly a big part of my Lemmy experience, and they could have just asked for people to volunteer as mods. Regardless of how I feel about it, the reason it’s damaging is because of how people who don’t understand it will view it.

          • Kichae@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But if you’re not on their site, they’re not responsible to you. They are responsible to their local community.

            They maybe could have spared your admin the courtesy of a “if you can’t control this right now, we’ll have to defederate” email or something, but if the tools aren’t there to keep up, they’re not there.

        • Kichae@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah. People struggle with the idea of “independent websites” when you can view posts from them on other websites.

          And when there isn’t a hedge fund backing them.

          • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A server has every right to run however they want. I agree.

            What I have a problem with are the server discovery tools and sites still listing beehaw as if it is participating in the fedeverse the same way as all of the other truly open servers.

          • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you originally from beehaw? I’ve seen you defending them many times and I almost always agree with your points. Keep up the good work 🫡

            • Kichae@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nope. I’ve never actually directly been to the site.

              I just stumbled into Mastodon last April to watch people flee Twitter, and fell in love with the whole distributed social concept.

              The Internet was a digital anarchist space when I first encountered it in the 90s, and that’s what I want it to be again. And the right to disengage is tied up in that.

              • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Cool. You’re a valuable contributor and I hope you stick around. I was hoping for an opportunity to apologize to beehaw on behalf of my server 🤷

      • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was on beehaw too. I’m not happy with the defederation but I understand.

        I left but I’m happy it’s great if it’s working for them. This is why a federation is great, there is option for everyone.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. I don’t mind a few words to try and convince someone I’m not a bot but it should still be a semiautomatic system (e.g. auto-approve after a few hours if you don’t get explicitly denied). I think approvals simply got backed up because 1 or 2 ppl were approving these and it suddenly turned into thousands of applications per hour.

      • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if they don’t require it, it’s always a good idea to setup your email, it’s necessary to recover your password in case of problems.

        • TechnoBabble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          On these types of forums I always figure if I forget my password then it’s time to make a new account anyway.

          Nothing I post here is essential to me, and I can always find past exchanges from any random account.

          And personally, I figure the longer I post under a single persona, the easier it is to connect that persona to my real identity. So account switching is good every once in a while.

      • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only if you sign up through old.Reddit. And that’s because old Reddit is still using legacy code that didn’t require it. The default new Reddit sign up requires an email or signing up through Apple/google accounts.

  • patchymoose@rammy.site
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like lemmy.world because it seems to be neutral and doesn’t have heavy handed moderators. Communities are allowed to bloom and grow. It’s scalable.

    I respect what Beehaw wants to do, but their goals are not realistic if they want to be a platform of any significant size.

    So far I also like the communities I’ve seen on Lemmy.ml, but there have been a lot of technical/server issues.

      • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        seemed like a genuine nice guy

        He indeed is, on top of truly knowing what he’s doing.

        My reason for being here is, while checking other instances, I saw a post by lemmy.ml admins saying they were overloaded by the influx of new people.

        Since they had 1k people, I thought max 500 could be a good number (lemmy.world was a bit less than 500 when I joined).

        I checked small instances and this one gave me really good vibes, more than the others, so here I am and I couldn’t be happier about it :)

      • Marxine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same thing for me. I have my own biases, but I kinda expect to be exposed to things I don’t agree sometimes: knowledge is good and trying to understand other viewpoints is useful (even if to know how someone could get something so wrong).

        lemmy.world provides me that, I can engage with content I clearly enjoy, and debate (in a civil way) about things I disagree. And if something is really egregious I can block it myself.

      • TechnoBabble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there a way I can view which instances are defederated?

        I don’t mind/am glad not seeing self harm stuff and CSAM content, but if this instance is disconnecting from piracy and hacking related content I’d like to be aware of that.

    • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      but their goals are not realistic if they want to be a platform of any significant size.

      As I understand it, they don’t care about being big, they care about having a community of people that align to their principles.

      Problem is, if you don’t pay too much attention to their server description, you might not realize what their principles are.

      I think they got so big because many people were just trying to join any instance under the massive influx, without thinking much about it, and beehaw became much bigger than they intended to be (or expected).

      Now that they have defederated from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, people “not intended” to be there are leaving, that should bring them “more down” than they currently are, I think that’s what they actually want.

      • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Beehaw controls their sign-ups. What they don’t like are people they have not vetted commenting on posts in their communities. They don’t like it because some people were ‘trolling and spamming’ and they can’t keep up with the moderation.

        They have 4 admin ls trying to do everything and they are not going to open up until they get moderation tools that make it possible to run a large site with just those 4 people.

        Basically, they don’t have a philosophy of running a server that is compatible with being in a federated environment.

        • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are not intended to be a large site, at all.

          Whether that’s compatible with federation or not, I don’t know, but I honestly couldn’t care less and I don’t get why some people still think it’s a big deal.

          There were 2 big communities of value on their server but there are already growing alternatives elsewhere, so everything is fine in my book, that’s the beauty of the fediverse IMO.

          • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It is only a big deal if new people.sign up there, get a poor impression of what lemmy is, and never try any other lemmy experience again.

            That is what the big deal is. People want lemmy to be successful and to grow into a network of servers with good participation.

            I dont care what beehaw does, I just feel they should not be listed on discovery sites while they are not sanely federated.

            • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re right, it’s a problem for new users unfortunately, beehaw should be quite more explicit on their server descriptions and rules.

              Not sure about delisting them, that would be detrimental to those actually looking for a place like that, but they surely shouldn’t recommend people to go there as a general instance, it’s not just about federation, even if they were federated, that place is not for everyone.

  • MuadDoc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hats off to the creator of LW, it can’t be easy running a server this big. I do hope we don’t just dominate the fediverse though, would kinda defeat the purpose of it.

    • Maximilious@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kbin.social user chiming in here! I haven’t checked out Lemmy but I’m content with what kbin offers me so far.

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I browsed mostly on a laptop or desktop then kbin is great. On mobile I think it’s just barely passable and I was quite annoyed not having a dedicated app.

      • exscape@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use both so far, but prefer Kbin (the UI/design is much better IMO). It’s especially nice that it’s compatible enough that we’re posting this on lemmy.world :-)

        • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I love kbin, but I recently noticed it doesn’t seem to have a way of saving posts/comments? At least not one that I can find, it’s probably in there somewhere, I can’t imagine they just Wouldn’t Have that as a feature

          • OneShoeBoy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you ‘boost’ a comment/post it saves it to your profile under ‘boosts’. Though I just checked a post that I boosted and am getting a 503 error at the moment so might not be working right now?

            • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t even see a boost option on any of the lemmy instances I’m on (using through mobile web apps), I thought that was a kbin-only thing for Mastodon compatibility, but I might be wrong

              • OneShoeBoy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sorry yes you’re right, that’s a Kbin feature that’s not on Lemmy.

                I have a little star for me on lemmy.world if I hit the 3 dot ‘more’ settings on comments and it shows automatically on posts for me to save posts/comments.

                Could be an instance specific setting?

    • SickIcarus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s gotta start somewhere though. It makes sense that as refugees flock over they’ll gravitate towards the largest instance, because the expectation is that’s where the usage is and they don’t yet grok how the Fediverse works. As they settle in, I’d expect a number of them to spread out a bit. Once we can migrate accounts I’d expect the load to be distributed even better.

      • pzza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Load would not be distributed though right? Because all the user data / activity would just be copied to every federating instance. Fediverse is more about redundancy & lack of centralized control, rather than load balancing.

        • SickIcarus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes and no? Maybe? I’m still figuring out how all this works lol. I know that instances take on the load of their users and communities.

          • pzza@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            As I understand it the federation protocol is copying all the data from instance to instance. I think data is probably going to be the most taxing part of running a social media site, but since all the data is replicated, there wont be much load sharing there. Each instance will be taking care of the cpu/load requirements of rendering/serving the pages for their users, so there is some scaling benefits there to distribution. Anyway, I’m also still learning as well! I think we all are lol

      • Corhen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When I signed up to lemmy.world, I thought I was choosing one instance to use. I didn’t intially realize they were ALL available from RVERY instance.

        Since then I’ve joined Lemmy.ca, lemmynsfw, and beehaw.

        • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          But then you’re still not getting it? You don’t need to join other instances, you can subscribe to communities from any instances in the Fediverse without joining another instance.

          • Corhen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s what I’m saying, when I joined I thought I HAD to, since I didn’t understand federation.

            Now I know how it works

    • Teh@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been unable to get the sign up process to finish on Lenny.world. Fill out the fields and the submit button just spins forever.

      • Czele@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is already a user named Teh in lemmy.world so maybe that’s why You are unable to create an account

    • corytheboyd@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Rather, more instances, not servers. An instance can scale out using as many servers as the owner can tolerate.

      I certainly wouldn’t want to be the one managing a horizontally scaled fediverse instance on a cloud platform though, that shit adds up fast, and no way in hell is anyone going to donate here.

      I honestly don’t get how that’s supposed to work indefinitely, that’s usually where ad money comes in and… god dammit we’re back to square one lol. I’m here for a good time, not a long time 😎

      • JakeBacon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m new here but if I stick around long enough I’ll probably get up my own server/instance(s) for the various parts of the fediverse I participle in. Mostly because it sounds neat and partially because it would allow other people I know to have a fediverse “home” operated by a familiar face (if the fediverse gets popular among the mainstream).

        Right now it’s just Lemmy, but I may eventually participate in Mastodon, Matrix, Peertube, Owncast and.

        I’m going to wait first though to see if the Lemmy userbase (and platform) remains healthy and/or grows. Then would come the hard part of setup, I’m familiar with technology, but nowhere near a professional or a hobbyist (unless you count gaming).

        • 🇺🇦 seirim @lemmy.pro
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I set up our instance at Lemmy.pro for pretty much those same reasons, just to contribute in some way (I read messaging at Lemmy.ml when I first came around that adding instances helped) and make a space I could control my own account from.

      • levochemist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I definitely think that ads will start appearing on the bigger instances especially since the overhead will most likely outpace donations. I could also see a lot of super small instances pop up just for people to host for their friends. I’m thinking about creating an instance just for me and a few friends but I’ll definitely have to deviate from my standard Reddiy username, can’t let that cat out of the bag.

        • TechnoBabble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve said it before, but I really think that “Reddit Gold” was an excellent non-invasive monetization strategy.

          Gold didn’t really do much but put a little coin above a comment, and it supported the site for a long time without having to pump in advertising, which many people would block anyway.

          I gilded a total of 3 times maybe, over the years. And that $12 or whatever was way more than Reddit ever got out of me from ads, since I block them all.

      • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is nothing wrong with having ads on a server. A server / instance should monetize itself like crazy if they want to. If users don’t like it, they now have options! They’re not stuck in a place like reddit.

        That’s why I’m so excited by federation.

        • Rairii@haqueers.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          @econpol @corytheboyd i wonder what makes anybody think nobody will donate, quite a few fedi servers manage to survive off of donations

          i think a couple of fedi servers are semi-private with paid accounts on a subscription basis, too

          • corytheboyd@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mostly the pessimist in me talking about the general case. Getting many people to pay for something that is free somewhere else is an uphill battle.

            When the service is good enough, I don’t at all mind throwing in ~$5/month. Example services like that I pay for: Fastmail, Bitwarden, Mullvad

            Doesn’t mean it can’t work, and success is much easier at small scale (like you said, paid private).

    • JasSmith@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There will be both. I think many will appreciate the simplicity of large instances.

    • Adub@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m betting that is going to occur with growing out communities. They will probably have disagreement with admin then move or just want a more focused community that people can click local & get what they want.

      We have to see people show up, learn, and start to enjoy it. A big instance has some perks for the time being and everyone might want to see its sticking power before dealing with headache of running their own instance.

    • hardypart@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thing is, as long as it’s not possible to merge similar communities from different instances, large instances are actually preferable from a User uxperience point of view.

      • Nicholas Karl@libranet.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        @hardypart
        Agreed; I was more concerned with the possibility of the vast bulk of communities ending up on a couple instances rather than having major communities spread out. Having some way to keep similar communities connected and effectively moderated would be a great boon for us. How we best go about that, I’m not sure.

  • TeaHands@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    And to think I made this account because it was a nice small instance with only 100 active users. That worked out well.

  • Hedup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where’s the Dodge!? That was the best part about this meme.

  • ninetynine@lemmy.film
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like the small instance I belong to. It’s represented by one or two of those buildings in that picture and that’s okay.

    • Sigmatank@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I also like my small instance (BTW: donate to your instances!) I really hope that each instance ends up with like, one dominant community, so the traffic gets spread out and doesn’t accidentally crush anything

  • fox@lemmy.fakecake.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    i’d rather have a mesh of small-ish instances instead of several huge ones, that aside the more people the better.

    • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that will be a lot more feasible if the capability to migrate user accounts between instances is added.

      Right now for a new user joining the fediverse, the largest instances are the best option since they are the most likely to remain up and federated with most other instances. Why would you join some random smaller instance when there’s a clearly established one already there?

      Making it possible to change instances would remove some of this friction - then your choice of initial instance isn’t important.

      • fox@lemmy.fakecake.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        recent events with beehaw have shown that being on a large instance does not guarantee federation.

        i’m all for roaming profiles even though i think the best option is hosting a personal or a friends-only instance - unless you’re a colossal asshole nobody will defederate you, you’re are not depending on anyone but yourself for your profile and subscriptions, etc etc. this obviously isn’t for everyone but the barrier of entry is sufficiently low for people interested in tech and fediverse to do just that.

        email has started as a fully distributed system but - for reasons too many to count here - ended up centralized over several huge providers, openly dictating rules to everyone else. i’d rather fediverse not followed this road.

    • cerevant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think federation wars will cause that end point. If I wanted to start a community- or group of communities- I’d put them on their own instance and not have user signups. That minimizes exposure to conflict - either you like sports communities / Pathfinder communities / whatever or you don’t. If beehaw wants to lock themselves down it doesn’t affect my community. If Lemmy.world gets blocked by a bunch of instances it doesn’t affect my community. I don’t have to deal with the consequences on other instances of users coming from my instance.

      I’d go a step further and say that identity management should exist separately from content, but that would probably break brains already struggling with the concept of federation.

      • 🇺🇦 seirim @lemmy.pro
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago
        • Identity management should be separate from content

        100% this, it’s kind of weird that it’s not.

        Just like you thought of having your own instance for a custom set of content with independence, I made my own instance for pretty much an identity base I can maybe control well.

        We’ll try to make a good community or two, but I don’t know if I’m good enough or have enough time to grow and moderate one well.

        • fox@lemmy.fakecake.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          100% this, it’s kind of weird that it’s not.

          unless you depend on a third party, this is a nontrivial problem.

  • chrizbie@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve ended up making accounts all over the place since I started over a week ago, just recently found an instance for my country so that’s my new home! I freaking love this fediverse, feels good man