• SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Income doesn’t necessarily mean cash though. I’m not saying don’t have it part of the package, but the basics need to be met. Like food/water/electric/shelter. The rest they have to figure out.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It does mean cash. Its more efficient to let individuals turn cash into quality of life, than just providing services.

      One of the main bits with UBI is that government is very slow to adapt to changing requirements. By mandating what people get, it leads to a lot of inefficiency. A more extreme example is the planned economy of the USSR. It just didn’t work well.

      UBI lets the people involved decide what is more effective for them. E.g. 1 person might decide that turning the heating up is good. Another might invest in merino wool underlayers, since they tend to work outside.

      An understated point though is that the basics should be easily attainable. Then again, that’s a basic measure of a society, even if multiple countries, that should be able to do better, are failing at it.