• cottonmon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Based on the other poster above, it was the Darwinia devs who reached out to Steam. So Darwinia isn’t a particularly good example either.

    • Rose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      What’s your point though? Every one of Epic’s exclusivity deals is done with the consent of the game publisher. Does it matter who makes the offer? Do we even know that there aren’t cases of publishers reaching out to Epic?

      • cottonmon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Does anyone know how to permalink a post on Lemmy? Anyway, here’s what Snot said:

        Also, to be clear on the differences, Valve didn’t reach out offering to pay for a massively popular upcoming game, which is what Epic does as a business model. They had a company that was about to fail reach out to them, and they made an exclusivity deal with them, but Valve did not pay them for this deal. If you really fail to see the difference between those two things, I don’t know what to tell you.

        • Rose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Gamers and developers benefit from the developers being paid rather than not being paid for the same thing.