Kbinners? Binnies? Kbinators?

    • gus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m just gonna come out and say it because I think people don’t realize and it may be specific to US - if kbeans sticks we will be called “kbeaners” by trolls until the end of time, as it includes a racial slur aimed at hispanic/latino people

      Honestly I bet a fair amount of people will even unintentionally use it without realizing. And if we have the ability to choose, I’d rather our nickname not be something that invites people to easily combine it with a slur

  • Blakerboy777@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been thinking about this for a little while now and I think Fedditor is the best choice.

    1. Between Kbin and Lemmy, there’s already two choices of software platforms for Reddit-esque link aggregators that work together. In the future there may be more. I think the term should be inclusive.
    2. Fedditor is play on redditor, a widely used term for users of the privately owned Reddit. A fedditor is a user of a Fediverse alternative.
    3. Since ActivityPub is an underlying protocol that interfaces with the rest of the Fediverse, I think emphasizing the Fediverse aspect and the “reddit-esque” aspect is more important than the specific software platform.
    4. People may use different terms for Kbin vs Lemmy vs future alternatives (or ones I just don’t know about), but they may also use different terms for the instance they use or for the magazine/group that they are a part of. I think if any term becomes widespread, it should be an inclusive term that fall underneath a more general term such as Fedditor.
    • onepinksheep@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fedditor sounds like a nice, platform-neutral term, but it might be a little too close to Reddit. I can’t think of an alternative, though. But your idea of a general Fediverse term rather than a platform specific one is good.

      • callyral@readit.buzz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        ooh! that’s so neat, specially fitting since fediverse implies a kind of universe to be explored by, well, fedinauts

      • speck@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ooh, fedinauts is good. Definitely agree to prioritize something which doesn’t favor a particular instance and rather emphasizes the idea of the fediverse. Also, the ~nauts variations also connote a sort of star trek federation vibe, which suits this whole endeavor.

      • Blakerboy777@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If we really want to get away from reddit, we could follow the standard convention when it comes to user designations. A person who uses
        Facebook is called a Facebook user. A person who uses Twitter is called a Twitter user. A person who uses Android is an Android user. Reddit is somewhat unique among the most popular websites as people identify other users like they’re in a fandom rather than people who have an account on a particular website. I’m not sure if other fedditors want to even think about themselves as part of a fediverse fandom. I do think redditor was a fortuitous term for reddit to happen upon because it flows from standard convention (it sounds a lot better than reddinite, reddinese, reddan). If you start from wanting to designate a user of the Fediverse or ActivityPub protocol, I think Fedinite or Feditor are two obvious choices. I went with Fedditor with the double consonant as an homage, but I think if migration was coming from a website where everyone was just called “Forum Users”, Feditor would still be a top suggestion.

    • solomoncaygnuyou@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like this idea. A term that is site-agnostic is a good idea since there are so many potential names for any given instance.

      There’s also just no elegant way to turn “kbins.social” into a term that rolls off the tongue. “k-beans” and similar terms are just awkward and I can’t see them being adopted en masse.

    • psyspoop@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree with just simple kbinner. Kbinauts and kbean are just too cutesy/gimmicky and imo are kinda cringey, especially if you start using it in regular speech ever.

      • noughtnaut@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your logic is flawless and I fully support, plus it sounds rather cute.

        However I must say that it seems too obscure, as most users won’t know (nor care) who created the initial codebase, and there’s no obvious association between “kbin” and “ern”.

    • Izzgo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did too until I learned (two minutes ago) that Beaner is a derogatory slur originally from the United States to refer to individuals of Hispanic or Latino descent, particularly those that are Mexicans from Mexico or of Mexican American descent. source: Wikipedia

      • LostCause@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That sucks, I don‘t think we should let slurs ruin an otherwise perfectly fine word like bean, I love beans, but maybe it‘s not the best choice then. Guess we could do some poll to see how other names fare though.

        • corm@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I also love beans, especially coffee beans.

          Can we not be so touchy as to let the word “bean” be ruined? Come on. That’s just some hardcore virtue signaling if you ask me.