• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Oh, in that case he definitely deserved to die. Carry on, then.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I know you need for me to hold the position that he deserved to die but I just don’t. You’re welcome to continue trying to put words in my mouth though.

      I’m not particularly broken up about a gun thief dying, no. But I think we can all stop pretending like the guy didn’t have agency and drove himself into a truck all by himself.

      I kind of stopped giving a fuck about stupid people dying around the time a bunch of dipshits refused a life saving vaccine during a pandemic.

      This is just a different flavor of that.

      • Drusas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        If you’re being chased, then no, you didn’t drive yourself into something all by yourself. There was an extremely significant external factor.

        • Iceblade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          That guy chose to gamble - running and maybe escaping (but also maybe getting seriously injured/die) instead of doing 5-10 for possession of a stolen firearm.

          Attempting to evade the police can’t be allowed to be a blank cheque to get away with crime.

          • Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s the thing, you throw out 5-10 like it’s nothing. Not to mention what going to jail and having a felony on your record do to your life. That’s a significant amount of your life, which you don’t get back. We can only speculate what led to him being in that position, but once there, consequences that steep strongly incentivize evasion. I have a similar thought experiment that tends to piss some people off: You’re guilty of something (imagine) and you’re evading and a law enforcement dog is chasing you. You’re far enough away from the actual officers and the only way you’re getting connected to the crime is that dog. It catches up to you, you have a weapon (baseball bat). Do you surrender to it knowing you’re facing charges of 5-10 years?

            • Iceblade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              In this imaginative situation, and assuming I were (beyond any doubt) certain that the dog were the only thing, I’d probably kill the dog with the bat. That doesn’t mean it would be the right thing to do.

              In reality however, I’d avoid making the choices to get into that situation in the first place (and there are a lot of other options).

              • Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Completely agree, I can’t hardly imagine a series of choices I would actually make that could lead me to such a situation. And it definitely wouldn’t be the right thing to do, just the subjectively imperative choice given circumstances. Just a what if, that naturally gets under the skin of many, especially (in my experience) those that equate animal life with human life, but that’s a different rabbit hole.