Related to the question about whether facial expressions are universal.

Are there words/verbal expressions/sounds that exist in every language and have the same meaning in every language?

(I’d also count words that are very similar.)

One example, that I believe is universal is M followed by a vowel followed by another M and optionally another vowel, meaning “Mother”.

At least in any language I know, this seems to hold true (mom, Mama, mamma, Mami, …).

Any other examples?

Edit: To clarify, I am not looking for very popular words that have been imported into most languages (like how almost everyone worldwide knows what Ketchup is), but about words that are “native” to humans. So if you pick someone from an uncontacted native tribe and tell them nothing, they would be able to understand/use that word/sound/verbal expression.

  • theRealBassist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hi! I’m a linguist, and this topic is one that comes up commonly.

    The answer is no. There is no such thing as languages/words that are native to humans. You can have things that are widely shared (mama/papa based on baby-talk as an example), but seeing as language itself is not universal to humans, there is no such thing as a word that is universal.

    Feel free to ask any questions if you’re curious!

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Haha I first read your “The answer is no” sentence and thought you were literally referring to the word “no”. If anything would be universal or at least well understand, I would think “no” would be a likely candidate. Guess not!

    • FearTheCron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      How common are things like the bouba/kiki effect in linguistics? It seems there are some sounds that are based on something other than learned behavior, how much does this cause commonality in real language?

      • theRealBassist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hi! Sorry for the delay, took a break from social media.

        It’s often an effect of local convergent evolution, effectively.

        Like if the group next to you has certain associations, well you’re likely to have similar associations. It’s also hard to verify some of that research due to the nature of how it’s conducted.

        • FearTheCron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No worries, thanks for the response!

          Interesting answer, scanning through the Wikipedia article on kiki/bouba it makes sense that we don’t really have solid evidence that it isn’t a learned trait. It may be hard to get a population of people who developed language independently of all other humans ever and see if they maintain the strong correlation with naming kiki and bouba.

          So I guess that brings up another question I have kinda wondered about. What is the most “isolated” spoken language on the planet? By that, I mean the language that evolved most independently of other spoken languages. Is there anything interesting that can be learned by comparing such a language to the European languages that are dominant among the global population?

          • theRealBassist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Great question! Here’s the thing though, the language had to come from somewhere right? The people had to come from somewhere.

            The assumptions and associations that make up the basis of language are thousands of years old. Obviously languages change and societies change, but no one has ever protested about the “k” sound being too “harsh” or something, or at least not seriously.

            Even an extremely isolated population would likely still be heavily influenced by whatever the parent language is.