• Zarxrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m always skeptical of the idea that people can’t handle more than one news story at a time.

    So NBC wants to point out that there wasn’t much coverage of this issue? Maybe NBC should take some responsibility for not pushing the story harder in the first place?

  • obsoleted@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Compared to story about yet another ship carrying illegals that deliberately sank, it is not that often that you hear about a “homemade” submarine that disappeared somewhere near the Titanic. And, in this case, it is/was a race against time to try and find the submarine, therefore we see frequent updates in the news.

  • ANGRY_MAPLE@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Does anyone else see the irony of these posts?

    Instead of also pushing for this incident to get a lot of solo coverage, many people talking about the billionaires coverage in relation to it. When you mention the submersible in relation to the capsized boat, you are now also talking about the submersible.

    Please just focus on the capsized boat if you want people to focus about the capsized boat. Don’t bridge the two incidents together if they aren’t already bridged together in the conversation. Connecting the two incidents just keeps looping the submersible story back into the mix. The discussions have changed to talking about media bias instead of talking about how to stop people from regularly dying on these boats.

    People will pay more attention to this if it’s its own story. “What about” tends to get poor coverage and media attention.

    • Naryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Please just focus on the capsized boat if you want people to focus about the capsized boat.

      The story is about how news media focus on certain topics over others. It’s using the Titan submersible and the Libyan disaster as examples for it.

      The money, time and effort to save the Titan submersible has been huge, whereas the same effort has ignored this incident.

      People will pay more attention to this if it’s its own story. “What about” tends to get poor coverage and media attention.

      There have been articles about this, they don’t get any traction nor do they get sympathy because of the people on board the boat.

  • Cruxifux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah but one of those was good news and the other one was a tragedy that killed hundreds.

    • assa123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And good news are worth spreading while to tragedies one pays respect. Anyway, it’s a shame that level of disparity in assigned resources.

      • Cruxifux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, it’s a shame that you have to commit atrocities towards your fellow man to accrue that wealth and there’s rarely any justice over it. I’m not going to be shamed for celebrating when justice is doled out.

        Nobody should cry for Hitler either.

        • assa123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Me neither, my point is that this (small?) redistribution of wealth is the good news (and worth celebrating!).

  • tomdenhagen3@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s easy to see this as a parallel to the value our society places on human lives of different societal classes and nationalities. But I also think the sub story has so much traction because it’s an ongoing story with a fight against the clock, where there’s a, however small, glimmer of hope.

    The boys stuck in the cave in Thailand a while ago weren’t overlooked either.

    • beefcat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s also the massive scandal over the fact that the submarine was not safe at all and should never have been used for manned missions, making it something of a leopards at my face moment. This has made it emminently memeable, so people are talking about it even more.

      A boat sinking on its way to Libya is definitely more tragic, but also not nearly as unusual or attention grabbing. No sane person is about to make memes about a few hundred dead migrants.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    One is a tale of hubris with pretty well defined details. The other is a gross mass tragedy with political undertones and cultural nuance that is hard to parse for normie news audiences.

  • MuadDoc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    People going missing in the Mediterranean is old news. That one guy did it for like 20 years.

  • hardypart@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Rich men playing stupid games and winning stupid prices. I don’t understand why they’re getting so much coverage.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I understand.

      Migrants drowning isn’t entertainment unless you’re a sociopath.

      Millionaires and Billionaires slowly suffocating in a little tube at the bottom of the ocean because they wanted to spend their money on something pointlessly dangerous just for bragging rights?

      Make some popcorn.

      News as news doesn’t sell advertising dollars. If all you want is information about what’s happening in the world, we used to get that in 1 or 2 hours a night. Back then they’d only need to go back to the story if there was new information.

      Now there are organizations dedicated to spewing “news” 24x7. That’s not news, that’s entertainment. Once it becomes entertainment, it’s not about the information, it’s just about keeping the focus on what keeps eyeballs glued to the screen. Right now, that’s dying rich people.

      Hell, I doubt there is ever a time when the majority of people on earth don’t want to watch rich people suffer and die.

      • Willer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh awesome rich people suffocating?! Sum aint right with your take. I think its mainly because fucking everyone knows titanic and recognize the deja vu of this incident

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is also a factor of rich people’s loved ones having the same assess to news broadcast platforms and can raise awareness faster.

      You and me are going to drown out at sea and we might get a mention from our loved ones after the fact.

      These guys though, they know the friend of the sister that works at the BBC, they know the mother of the tik-tok enthusiast who has like 1.3 million followers. It’s essentially a giant mega phone they get to blast from contacts.

      There is also the reward factor, as immigrants rescued at sea have nothing to give, in fact some people have to explain to their superiors why they wasted resources in such a case.

      But you save 3 billionaires and 2 multimillionaires from a metal coffin, and you bet there is a reward for that. Not only from a cut of the inevitable book sales/movies that would take place, from being seen as the heros, and if these five were super grateful, I imagine a $$$,$$$,$$$ reward too. Even if it is just their bodies found for their loved ones.

  • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re a parasite on society. I don’t know why people care so much. In contrast, it’s really tragic in every way that the migrant ship had to even exist.

    • Kabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      While I generally agree, I think people are getting too hung up on the fact that the missing crew are all wealthy - that’s not really the point.

      It’s a fascinating story because we are dealing with a potential (albeit at this stage incredibly unlikely) deep-sea rescue of the sort that has never been attempted before, at depths that only a handful of craft are capable of even reaching, and we know that time is quickly running out.

      Then you have the angle that the company that runs the expeditions is alleged to have ignored early safety warnings about the vessel’s ability to reach the extreme depths as advertized, combined with the CEO’s application of the “move fast and break things” technocratic mentality to deep sea exploration.

      Even if the occupants of the submersible were regular joes, or even (at the risk of sounding crass) refugees, it would still be a attention-grabbing news item.

      • Bird_Lawyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is some sense of, I feel like justice isn’t the right word, irony? that the pilot is the founder and CEO. Since his mentality may be the reason for his demise.

        Sucks that 4 others are likely to lose their lives too, but they ultimately signed the waiver and assumed the risk. Just a crazy and tragic situation.

  • Willer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think that is because the sub incident had potential to have a happy ending…for at least 5 seconds. Also it is linked to a popular tragedy. Whereas the people dying on migration and human trafficing are inherently horrible and its just depressing to read about it.

    • Naryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that is because the sub incident had potential to have a happy ending…for at least 5 seconds.

      You realise had the same time and effort been used to rescue the people from this incident, many more lives could have been saved right?

  • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Half the attention on titan was people making fun of billionaires for being so used to buying their way out of problems that they didn’t think bad things could happen to them so honestly if were gonna break down social reactions to these two events Its gonna have to take into consideration a lot of factors.