The average liter of bottled water has nearly a quarter million invisible pieces of ever so tiny nanoplastics, detected and categorized for the first time by a microscope using dual lasers.

Scientists long figured there were lots of these microscopic plastic pieces, but until researchers at Columbia and Rutgers universities did their calculations they never knew how many or what kind. Looking at five samples each of three common bottled water brands, researchers found particle levels ranged from 110,000 to 400,000 per liter, averaging at around 240,000 according to a study in Monday’s Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

These are particles that are less than a micron in size. There are 25,400 microns — also called micrometers because it is a millionth of a meter — in an inch. A human hair is about 83 microns wide.

Previous studies have looked at slightly bigger microplastics that range from the visible 5 millimeters, less than a quarter of an inch, to one micron. About 10 to 100 times more nanoplastics than microplastics were discovered in bottled water, the study found.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    11 months ago

    Scientists actually studying the issue:

    “Not sure. We studying the issue.”

    Lemmy:

    “But I FEEL it’s harmful! I’ve done my research!”

    Antivaxxer by any chance? Because you’re tracking the same thought process.

    Whenever something like this comes up, of which I’m ignorant, I ask myself, “By what mechanisms could this be true or false? How would that work?”

    Your turn.

    • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Wow man. I wrote, “Sheesh.”

      And you got AAAAAALLLL this:

      Scientists actually studying the issue:

      “Not sure. We studying the issue.”

      Lemmy:

      “But I FEEL it’s harmful! I’ve done my research!”

      Antivaxxer by any chance? Because you’re tracking the same thought process.

      Whenever something like this comes up, of which I’m ignorant, I ask myself, “By what mechanisms could this be true or false? How would that work?”

      Your turn.

      Yeah, I’ll pass.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lmao…

      “We don’t know yet”, and “No” are two very different answers.

      Antivaxxers interpret “No [not harmful]” to mean “Yes [harmful]”.

      Completely unrelated.