More than 50 countries that are home to half the planet’s population are due to hold national elections in 2024, but the number of citizens exercising the right to vote is not unalloyed good news. The year looks set to test even the most robust democracies and to strengthen the hands of leaders with authoritarian leanings.
From Russia, Taiwan and the United Kingdom to India, El Salvador and South Africa, the presidential and legislative contests have huge implications for human rights, economies, international relations and prospects for peace in a volatile world.
In some countries, the balloting will be neither free nor fair. And in many, curbs on opposition candidates, weary electorates and the potential for manipulation and disinformation have made the fate of democracy a front-and-center campaign issue.
A possible rematch between President Joe Biden and his predecessor Donald Trump looms large in the election calendar; a Trump victory in November is perhaps the greatest global wildcard. Yet high-stakes votes before then also will gauge the “mood of dissatisfaction, impatience, uneasiness” among far-flung electorates, said Bronwen Maddox, director of the London-based think-tank Chatham House.
the world is going to shit based on the interests of the rich, and many people choose the easier option of blaming immigrants and black people.
Right wing authoritarianism is unfortunately pretty popular in Western democracies these days. I’m hopeful that things get better some day, but I’m also worried that they’ll get a whole lot worse before then.
Hmm… if there’s 200 or so countries and terms are usually 3 years then… 50 elections is a slow year?!
Tricky one this.
On one hand, such articles frequently position Western democracy as Best-ern Democracy and keen observers will know it’s largely a conceit : the varying archaic electoral systems are maintained to serve existing Power structures, the best funded campaigns usually win, the elected representatives are then in hoc to Capital to deliver the policies Ut wants, rather than in hoc to the electorate that put them there.
And that’s just the legal flaws, before we get to corruption in its many forms.
On the other hand, perhaps we should not take the stability and peace we have for granted. Most of the West now has developed far right organisations, that are trivial to activate, operating as they do on populist dogma. A small proportion of them genuinely harbour racist agendas - but the majority have just been propagandised to the point they are motivated for violent insurrection or other acts of terror .
Neither position sparks joy .
This is the best summary I could come up with:
LONDON (AP) — More than 50 countries that are home to half the planet’s population are due to hold national elections in 2024, but the number of citizens exercising the right to vote is not unalloyed good news.
From Russia, Taiwan and the United Kingdom to India, El Salvador and South Africa, the presidential and legislative contests have huge implications for human rights, economies, international relations and prospects for peace in a volatile world.
Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, the world’s longest-serving female leader, won a fourth successive term Monday in an election that opposition parties boycotted and preceded by violence.
India, the world’s most populous country, is due to hold a general election by mid-2024 that is likely to bring Prime Minister Narendra Modi of the right-wing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party a third consecutive term.
Mujtaba Rahman of political consultancy Eurasia Group predicted that the upcoming European Parliament races won’t produce a populist majority but “the center will lose ground compared to the last vote” in 2019.
The ANC has held the presidency and a majority in parliament since the end of the country’s racist apartheid system in 1994, but the previously revered organization won less than half the vote in 2021 local elections.
The original article contains 1,419 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 85%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Removed by mod
The MIC supports tens of thousands of jobs and cements our place as the global police force through our bloated military. No presidential candidate with a chance of winning will be anti-war
Removed by mod
Trump pointedly refused to help Ukraine and tried to blackmail them to lie about his rivals in exchange for aid. His refusal to aid Ukraine led to Russias invasion, he may not have started a war that involved American lives, but he had a huge hand in starting the Russo-Ukrainian war by following Russian orders
