The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website to Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoSomeone double check the physics here.startrek.websiteimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1206arrow-down114
arrow-up1192arrow-down1imageSomeone double check the physics here.startrek.websiteThe Picard Maneuver@startrek.website to Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squareHugin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up80·9 months agoI don’t think you can assume constant velocity. 16 forward movement lines on the top vs 13 on the bottom so it’s moving at 81.25% speed in the bottom compared to the top.
minus-squarepooberbee (any)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·9 months agoPretty sure speed lines increase logarithmically with speed, not linearly.
minus-squaresawdustprophet@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·9 months ago Pretty sure speed lines increase logarithmically with speed, not linearly. Does this account for the presence of speed holes?
minus-squareA_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·9 months ago Pretty sure speed lines increase logarithmically with speed, not linearly. Does this account for the presence of speed holes? You don’t have to quote the entire reply for them to know what you’re responding to lmao
minus-squareSteve@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 months agoAfrican or European style?
I don’t think you can assume constant velocity. 16 forward movement lines on the top vs 13 on the bottom so it’s moving at 81.25% speed in the bottom compared to the top.
Pretty sure speed lines increase logarithmically with speed, not linearly.
Does this account for the presence of speed holes?
You don’t have to quote the entire reply for them to know what you’re responding to lmao
African or European style?
Wow. I am truly impressed.