mistrgamin@lemmy.world to pissposting@lemmy.world · 10 months agoframe postinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1360arrow-down16
arrow-up1354arrow-down1imageframe postinglemmy.worldmistrgamin@lemmy.world to pissposting@lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squaremommykink@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down24·10 months agoThe human eye cannot process more than 20fps at a time anyway
minus-squareNoodle07@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·10 months agoThat’s stupid, I can only look at 1 picture at a time anyway
minus-squareLucidlethargy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoIt’s more than 10fps per eye for those with glasses. 20/20 refers to frame rates per eye. The worse your vision, the better your framerate!
minus-squareAdrianTheFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·10 months ago20fps looks very choppy unless there is a lot of motion blur. Where did you get this metric? and lower latency is often the main reason for higher framerates anyways
minus-squareEtherWhack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 months agoThere’s actually a study that found 500fps was about the max. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07861
The human eye cannot process more than 20fps at a time anyway
That’s stupid, I can only look at 1 picture at a time anyway
In total. So 10fps per eye
Yes, I thought that was implied.
It’s more than 10fps per eye for those with glasses.
20/20 refers to frame rates per eye. The worse your vision, the better your framerate!
1.25e-9 fps per person
20fps looks very choppy unless there is a lot of motion blur. Where did you get this metric? and lower latency is often the main reason for higher framerates anyways
There’s actually a study that found 500fps was about the max.
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07861
Whoosh