mistrgamin@lemmy.world to pissposting@lemmy.world · 10 months agoframe postinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1360arrow-down16
arrow-up1354arrow-down1imageframe postinglemmy.worldmistrgamin@lemmy.world to pissposting@lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareabbotsbury@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down2·10 months agoStrong disagree, the smoothness afforded by high frame rates will make any game where you directly control the camera feel much better to play.
minus-squaremoshtradamus666@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down8·10 months agoSo I guess you would miss because you had it. Basically what I said.
minus-squareabbotsbury@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·10 months agoAnyone playing an older game can have it. I used to think Half Life 2 was special because it just felt better to play, more responsive and fluid, but it turns out it’s just a well optimized game with a framerate cap of 300.
minus-squaremoshtradamus666@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·10 months agoDid you have a 300hz monitor back then?
minus-squareabbotsbury@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·10 months agoI did not, but decreased frame time is still noticeable on refresh rates lower than frame rate. Video with some more information and a useful graphic
Strong disagree, the smoothness afforded by high frame rates will make any game where you directly control the camera feel much better to play.
So I guess you would miss because you had it. Basically what I said.
Anyone playing an older game can have it. I used to think Half Life 2 was special because it just felt better to play, more responsive and fluid, but it turns out it’s just a well optimized game with a framerate cap of 300.
Did you have a 300hz monitor back then?
I did not, but decreased frame time is still noticeable on refresh rates lower than frame rate.
Video with some more information and a useful graphic