• mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      10 months ago

      Fourteen.

      I don’t think most people would disagree that “teenager” is a more accurate word to describe that age. Trust me, there is plenty fucked up with the OP picture, we don’t need to resort to hyperbolic language to get our point across.

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Its not hyperbolic, 14 is a teenage child. Teenager is not more accurate, because when you say a ‘teenage worker’ most would assume they were at least in the usually accepted ‘young adult’ range, 16-19, the image here is of a child worker. If they were 17 or 16 that might be different, though still literally, legally a child.