• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Sorry I only read part of the first part because it’s very very very long, it seems it’s about the longer range of planes Russia doesn’t really have.
    You may be right, but I believe it was Anders Puck Nielsen https://www.youtube.com/@anderspuck that claimed the F16 has better targeting range than the fighter jets Russia actually have.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Targeting range really isn’t going to matter as it’s doubtful the F-16’s primary role will be to engage in air to air combat with Russian fighters. It’s much better suited to SEAD / DEAD missions and dropping precision munitions on Russian armor and defended positions.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        You are probably right, I reviewed an older video by Puk Nielsen, and he states that the number of planes are far from enough to make air dominance possible.