• Groovygravygrape@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    100% agree this is a terrible looking house- I think the function of the raised platform must be because it’s on a dangerous corner or intersection, so it acts as a safety structure from vehicles. They would’ve gotten special planning permission to do something like that.

    • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I suspect that the shrubs and tree to the left of the picture had started destroying the retaining wall. You can see that there are wall-coloured encroachments onto the pavement on that side.

      The house isn’t at a corner, as such - the street to the side is bollarded off.

      So, given that the trees and retaining wall needed replacing, I’m guessing they took the opportunity to build the wall higher and level the whole garden. I probably would try to level it if I was rebuilding the wall too.

      I wonder if not backfilling the wall with soil means it no longer counts as a retaining wall, and thus circumvents some planning / structural issues.

    • NuclearArmWrestling@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bollards hidden in nice hedgework or a nice heavy duty wrought iron fence would look a lot better and not completely ruin the aesthetic.