I understand the problem with server overloading and the problems with hosting big database etc. But can’t we host short , compressed videos with just good enough quality . Like some of the high quality gifs on lemmy is much ,much bigger than the kind of videos i described . Or am i missing something ? I do understand the issues but then why do they allow big gifs is it because people wouldn’t post much gifs but everyone and their dog will post videos if allowed ? I am saying if 5 mb is the max size of gif you allow set that as videos limit too . AND I NOT AT ALL AM ASKING FOR VIDEOS ON LEMMY JUST ASKING A QUESTION . I IN NO WAY WANT VIDEOS ON LEMMY BECAUSE I KNOW HOW THAT WOULD IMPACT THE INSTANCE HOSTERS . MAYBE JUST MAYBE I SHOULD PUT MY WHOLE THOUGHTS IN A POST BEFORE POSTING AND STOP EDITING IN THINGS AS I GO LIKE AN IDIOT .

EDIT : I put the last sentence in caps because i just wanted to draw attention to it and i am not angry .

  • DarkNightoftheSoulEnglish
    10·
    10 months ago

    orders of magnitude difference in size between a 30 second gif and 30 second video

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      16·
      10 months ago

      Depending on the nature and technology involved in the “gif”, gifs of the same quality are usually larger per second just because they’re not real well-optimized. I think the issue is more the popularity+length+quality of the stuff that will get posted if you allow “real” videos as opposed to just gifs, which will lead to a massive increase in storage and bandwidth.