@ernest how do I report a Magazin on kbin.social ? There is a usere called “ps” who is posting to his own “antiwoke” Magazin on kbin.social. Please remove this and dont give them a chance to etablish them self on kbin.social. When I report his stuff it will go to him because he is the moderator of the magazin? Seems like a problem. Screenshot of the “antiwoke” Magazin /sub on kbin.social. 4 Headlines are visible, 2 exampels: “Time to reject the extrem trans lobby harming our society” “How to end wokeness” #Moderation #kbin #kbin.social 📎

edit: dont feed the troll, im shure ernest will delet them all when he sees this. report and move on.

Edit 2 : Ernest responded:
“I just need a little more time. There will likely be a technical break announced tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Along with the migration to new servers, we will be introducing new moderation tools that I am currently working on and testing (I had it planned for a bit later in my roadmap). Then, I will address your reports and handle them very seriously. I try my best to delete sensitive content, but with the current workload and ongoing relocation, it takes a lot of time. I am being extra cautious now. The regulations are quite general, and I would like to refine them together with you and do everything properly. For now, please make use of the option to block the magazine/author.”

  • kestrel7@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah I was worried this could become a problem, because I imagine a lot of chuds are turned off of lemmy because of the tankie devs. Which makes sense. But I don’t think they should be welcome here, either. I’m trying to get away from that authoritarian shit, not get closer to the even worse kind of authoritarian shit.

    • 10A@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hold on, I dislike authoritarianism too. Isn’t it authoritarian to ban users and magazines for expressing views with which you disagree?

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Isn’t it authoritarian to beat to death people expressing views with which you disagree with?

        Something which you all but advocated in the thread in question? You just want a platform to advocate far more extreme methods than bans.

        • 10A@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, not whatsoever. Try reading my entire comment on the purpose of freedom, and not cherrypicking a few words that look damning out of context.

          Also, I wrote “with which” so you didn’t need to add another “with” at the end.

          Edit: This was a bad answer. See below.

          • AnonTwo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            You know, even if it was cherrypicked (which it was not, I stand by it, and you’re welcome to try to actually argue how that’s not what you said and not pretend I didn’t read it)

            I just asked

            Isn’t it authoritarian to beat to death people expressing views with which you disagree with?

            You didn’t answer with “I never said that”

            You answered with

            No, not whatsoever.

            As far as I’m concerned you’re just pretending to be a mature guy who wants people to debate, but in truth you just want to shame people away from the hate speech that’s being spewed where people are either not responding or are making arguments in bad faith in response. Basically letting the text get onto the page and hoping everyone gives up.

            • 10A@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m sorry. I was replying to a lot of comments, and I totally misunderstood yours. I thought you copied and pasted what I wrote, and added the word “with”, because it ends with “with which you disagree with”. I only saw the grammatical error, not the complete change of question. Please forgive me.

              Yes, of course it’s authoritarian to beat someone to death for expressing a different view! Goodness, how is that even a question.

              I answered “No, not whatsoever” to your assertion that “You just want a platform to advocate far more extreme methods than bans.”

              I do like to debate, but I also like to keep things on topic, so I’ve been kinda trying to avoid debates in this thread, while also standing up for the relevant aspects of my rather unpopular opinions.

              I certainly don’t want to shame anyone for anything, and if I’ve inadvertently done that, I’m sorry.

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it’s just about disagreement, sure. But it’s not, it’s about whether you accept the paradox of the tolerance of intolerance.