The lawsuit alleges OpenAI crawled the web to amass huge amounts of data without people’s permission.

  • SamB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I doubt it’s only about some Reddit posts. The scrapping was done on the whole web, capturing everything it could. So besides stealing data and presenting it as its own, it seems to have collected some even more problematic data which wasn’t properly protected.

    • zekiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      But that really isn’t OpenAI’s fault. Whoever was in charge of securing the patients data really fucked up.

      • krellor@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Leaving your front door open isn’t prudent but doesn’t grant permission to others to enter and take/copy your belongings or data.

        The security teams may have royally screwed up, but OpenAI has a legal obligation to respect copyright and laws regarding data ownership.

        Likewise, they could have scraped pages that included terms of use, copyright, disclaimers, etc., and failed to honor them.

        All parties can be in the wrong for different reasons.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s a little closer to being mad that the Google street car drove by and snapped a picture of the front of your house, tbh.

        • Dran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          But does leaving your front door open allow one to legally take a picture of the inside from across the street? I’d say scraping is more akin to that than it is theft. Nothing is removed in scraping, just copied

          • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bad analogy. This is like leaving your couch out on the sidewalk, then complaining when someone takes a picture of it.

        • zekiz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s more like leaving an important letter in the open for everyone to read. It’s certainly your fault for leaving it that open.

      • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s certainly their fault that they used it, though.

        If they cared, they could have ensured they weren’t using sensitive or otherwise highly problematic information, but they chose not to. That’s on them.

    • tallwookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      if it was unsecured it’s basically public. whomever put that data on a publicly accessible server is at fault

      • priapus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s not necessarily true. Even if a company makes the mistake of not securing data correctly, those that make use of this data can still be at fault.

        If a company leaves a server wide open, you still can’t legally steal information from it.