• Encromion@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Maybe out in a limb here but, I think industry and aviation are two of the areas that should be able to use fossil fuels longer than others. Their energy expenditure is huge, yes, but the scientific advancement that is necessary to make them zero carbon are still quite a ways in the future.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It depends on the industry. We know how to prevent the bulk of emissions from concrete and steel, which are the big ones. And yes, aviation might well end up needing to use direct air capture to remove their emissions

    • Ben Matthews@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Who decides the ‘should be able to’ - do sectors get ‘grandfathering’ rights? Maybe energy-inefficient sectors should decline to give more space for smarter solutions. Much aviation could be replaced by faster rail or shipping, which is much less energy intensive. Many (not all) industrial products also have substitutes. Much concrete and steel is used to make unnecessary roads which cover green spaces, and in the case of China, blocks that nobody even lives in. Many agri-chemicals are over-applied, leading to water pollution.