• rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    9 months ago

    Headline should read, “American allies worry the US is growing less dependable, because of Republican House insurrectionists”

    • DarkNightoftheSoul
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, the headline correctly expresses the sentiments of foreign leaders about american stability, regardless of the outcome of our elections.

    • drislands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s a major part, but the key problem IMO is that the USA has shown multiple times that a change in president can be enough to shatter existing promises and expectations. Even if we got the most progressive, effective president in the history of our nation, anything they accomplished could be undone by a single change of admin.

      • Azal@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s a major part, but the key problem IMO is that the USA has shown multiple times that a change in president leadership can be enough to shatter existing promises and expectations.

        FTFY

        The US is fighting to even pay it’s own debts because of the political grabass going on in the Legislative branch and who knows now what the Judicial branch is going to throw up to change. The President is just the most visible change.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s mostly just that one time. Usually foreign policy continues from where it left off much to the chagrin of the voting base who wants it all to change overnight. And this is because of the reason you stated, you don’t want to break promises to other countries or everyone will thing the US is unreliable and that’s bad for the US. Sure foreign policy can be turned and start slowly moving on a different path, but that has to happen over time.

        Trump is the real outlier. He simply doesn’t understand foreign policy, thinks of everything as a money deal. His incredibly corruption on foreign policy led to him being impeached the first time. Causing rifts within NATO. Legitimizing North Korea by having a summit. Gushing over how great various authoritarians are. Ended anything Obama did out of spite. Cancelled Obama’s deal with Iran, which looked like a prelude to war because that’s what it would be if the US had competent foreign policy.

        In the first months of Trump’s Presidency when he was putting out aggressive statements about certain countries (usually on Twitter) countries would put their militaries on alert. After awhile no one bothered. The US simply didn’t have a leader anyone took seriously.

        This is the reason for Biden’s statement that “America is back.” But unfortunately the US Congress is blocking funding that’s needed for Ukraine, which would normally be a no-brainer in terms of foreign policy interests of the US. Usually something like that would go through with as a bipartisan thing with little to no negotiation necessary. Because it’s in the best interests of the US to fund Ukraine’s war effort against Russia, an adversary of the US. But it’s blocked, because the GOP willing to sabotage the US in their effort to sabotage Biden.

        So a Biden second term will mean the US isn’t saying insane things anymore, but really can’t be relied upon as it used to.

        A Trump second term? Chaos. Not even sure the US can survive another Trump term, let alone be relied on for anything.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you think that’s the only foreign policy issue America has, you might be wasting your money on that subscription to “The Atlantic”

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      9 months ago

      You think they can count on Geriatric Joe? Even if Trump doesn’t win the American government is a ship without a captain.

      • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        You act like Trump isn’t also old as fuck and sundowning. Dude babbles and slurs his speech in ways he didn’t when he was 60. Watch a video of Trump being interviewed by Letterman or Leno or whomever from a couple decades ago. He’s never been smart or eloquent but he wasn’t incoherent and angry (like dementia patients often get).

        I really don’t get how people think Biden is senile but Trump isn’t. Pundits are debating whether Biden’s age is a bigger issue than Trump’s indictments and it’s like, “Trump is lost and babbling in court! The judges keep having to tell him to shut the fuck up!”

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        As someone not from the US… hell yes Old Joe is reliable as fuck. It’s the Congress that’s willing to sabotage US interests to sabotage Biden that’s the problem. And a lot of that stems from Trump.

        A Trump presidency means having a captain steering the ship directly at an iceberg. A Biden Presidency means having a guy that’s almost as old as the sea itself trying to keep the ship going while Trump and his lackeys are drilling holes into the hull.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Old Joe literally got a court to say that he can’t be charged because he’s a dementing old man.

          3 days ago:

          The special counsel’s report said that it would be difficult to convict the president of improper handling of files because “at trial, Mr Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory”.

          “It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him - by then a former president well into his 80s of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.”

          Mr Hur’s report also said Mr Biden’s memory seemed to have “significant limitations” during interviews. He could not recall when he was vice-president (from 2009-2017), or “even within several years, when his son Beau died” (2015), the investigation said.